Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The manner in which healthcare organizations are paid for the services they provide can influence their organizational behavior. Healthcare organizations are generally paid in three ways: (1) on a cost-based basis, (2) on a capitation basis, or (3) on a case-based basis. On a cost-based basis, such as fee-for-service, the organization is paid for all the services it provides, which is a powerful incentive for high levels of effort and service. Payment on a capitation basis consists of a flat payment to the organization per person cared for, with the organization assuming the risk that the payment will cover the cost of the patient's care. On a case-based basis, the organization is paid a single payment for an episode of care, and the payment does not change if fewer or more services are provided. The various payment types may be either retrospective or prospective.

Medicare's Prospective Payment System

The best-known example of case-based payment in healthcare is Medicare's prospective payment system (PPS), which was mandated by the U.S. Congress to control community hospital inpatient costs in 1983. Under this system, the Medicare program changed its mode of payment for hospital inpatient care from a retrospective cost-based system to a prospective case-based system.

After the Medicare program was established in 1965 the costs of hospital care soared. One of the major factors that led to rising costs was the retrospective cost-based payment system. Under this system, hospitals submitted their bills to Medicare after the care had been given and the costs to the hospital were known. Hospitals were then paid for the care they provided, as allowed by Medicare rules, regardless of whether the costs were high or low, excessive or appropriate. Consequently, there was little incentive for hospitals to be cost-effective.

On the other hand, the prospective case-based payment system set payment rules prior to when the care was given. By setting a fixed reimbursement level per case based on diagnosis, the PPS provided economic incentives to conserve the use of resources. Hospitals that used more resources than covered by the flat rate lost the difference. Those with costs below the rate retained the difference.

Diagnosis Related Groups

Under Medicare's PPS, the amount paid to hospitals is based on their patients' Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs). Specifically, each patient is assigned into one of more than 500 DRGs, based on principal diagnosis, age, and medical complications. The DRGs aggregate patients with similar resource-consumption and hospital length-of-stay patterns. Medicare then pays the hospitals a set amount for each DRG. The government calculates the payment for each DRG based on national averages. It also modifies that amount somewhat based on local wage rates, geographic location (e.g., rural versus urban area), and whether the hospital is a teaching hospital.

Effects of Medicare's Prospective Payment System

Extensive research has been conducted to examine the impact of Medicare's PPS on hospitals and patients. This research has focused on the system's impact on average hospital length of stay, access to and quality of care, financial condition of hospitals, overall effects on costs, and hospital management.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading