Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Until the 2000 report by the national Institute of Medicine (IOM) To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System, medical errors were a relatively low priority in the U.S. healthcare system. Medical errors were regarded as uncommon. Physicians and other healthcare providers generally attributed them to “a few bad apples” and the occasional slip. However, data pointing to the pervasiveness of the problem were already available, leading the IOM to estimate that between 44,000 and 98,000 Americans die each year as a result of medical errors.

Since that report, medical errors and patient safety have become a major focus of health services research and policy making, providing a key role for the former in shaping the latter, as both government and nongovernmental organizations develop regulations and guidelines for reducing errors to improve patient safety and the quality of care. There has also been a major shift from blaming the individuals who make errors to recognizing that the individuals function within systems and that those systems critically influence individual performance.

Definitions and Concepts

Key definitions and concepts-many adapted from systems-based research on error prevention in other industries-underlie the current efforts to understand and prevent medical errors. An error is defined by the IOM as either the failure of a planned action to be completed as intended or the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim. The former is referred to as an error of execution and the latter as an error of planning. This formulation is based on the work of James Reason and others who extensively studied accidents in aviation and other industries.

Errors of execution are due either to slips or lapses. A slip is an observable error of execution, such as when a surgeon inadvertently cuts the wrong tissue. A lapse is unobservable, as when an internist forgets to order antibiotics for a patient with pneumonia after intending to do so. In both cases the physician knew what the right thing was to do and intended to do it. In contrast, errors of planning are mistakes in that the actions proceeded as planned but the plan was wrong.

Errors may be classified as biomedical or contextual, the former occurring because of inattention to processes occurring within the boundary of the skin and the latter from inattention to processes expressed outside that boundary-that is, processes that form the context of a patient's illness. Failing to prescribe a medication that effectively treats a serious condition is a biomedical error. Prescribing a medication that a patient cannot afford when a less costly effective medication is available is a contextual error. In both instances, the patient does not obtain the necessary therapy: in the first, from a failure to attend correctly to the patient's disease and, in the second, from inattention to the context surrounding the disease.

Fortunately, not all errors result in an adverse event, the term for an injury that is caused by medical mismanagement. Neglecting to wash one's hands prior to examining a postsurgical wound is an error, for instance, but in most cases this does not result in a wound infection because of the patients' inherent capacity to fight off infection. Conversely, adverse events may occur despite flawless care: A patient's surgical wound may become infected despite excellent sterile technique. Harm that is specifically attributable to error is termed a preventable adverse event.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading