Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Originally, the word formulary referred to a book listing the ingredients and formulae for making medicines. As the pharmaceutical companies took over the manufacturing task from the pharmacists, the term was used to refer to a list of those drugs that a hospital or other health care organization planned to carry in inventory. As drugs became more numerous and more effective and made up a greater portion of the health care budget, institutions and payers began to exert greater control over what did or did not go into that list. They became increasingly insistent that prescribers on their staff pay attention to that list. The hospital pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committees that make inclusion decisions became an important part of its governance process. Now formularies are a normal adjunct to the managed care process. Hospitals have them, health plans have them, and so do their pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs).

Employers and insurers often contract out (outsource) prescription drug management to one of a number of national PBM companies who also provide their own formularies. Physicians are expected to use the drugs on the list unless there is a good medical reason for not doing so. Often there is a separate formulary for each health plan that a physician's patients belong to. Most primary care physicians’ offices have hard copies (printouts) of the list from each payer, but the lists may or may not be up-to-date, and each has its own format. The result is that the prescriber is usually confused and angry about this complex constraint on professional autonomy and the doctor–patient relationship. The patient probably does not have the formulary information either, although it is usually available on the Internet. Patients become aware of it only when the pharmacy informs them of whether or not the patient's medical insurance will pay for it and what tier it falls into for copayment purposes.

Tiered Formularies

Most formularies are divided into tiers for reimbursement and copayment. Many programs use a three- or four-tiered program with generic substitutes requiring the lowest copayment, preferred drugs without accepted substitutes have a somewhat higher copayment, whereas nonpreferred drugs and branded drugs for which a substitute is available but not dispensed carry a much higher copayment. The fourth tier involves denial of payment because the drug is not medically necessary or not covered for some other reason without prior approval.

Controversies

Formularies are becoming increasingly controversial as managed care pharmacy benefits management covers more transactions, and there is increasing litigation as exclusion becomes more critical to the pharmaceutical manufacturer's profitability. Recently, litigation has centered on the efforts of states and other payers to use inclusion or exclusion in a health plan's formulary as a bargaining chip in negotiating price discounts. The individual states play a major role here because Medicaid programs do carry drug benefits, and the states have become increasingly aggressive trying to control drug costs.

Those who make formulary decisions should consider more than cost. The dominant membership of the P&T committee is usually physicians and pharmacists with representatives from nursing, other relevant professions, administration, and occasionally lay health plan members. The primary objective should be to provide the most cost-effective care for the patient, so efficacy and effectiveness are major concerns. Where more than one treatment is available, the committee must consider the comparative effectiveness of the contenders. As substitutes become available, it is important to consider equivalency based on pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, pharmacoeconomic, and safety information. Efficacy data are typically available from studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration for drug approval. Where possible, these are based on double-blind randomized controlled experiments. However, these experiments do not always approximate the way the approved drug performs under less controlled clinical conditions. Therefore, some argue that the P&T standard should be use effectiveness, which takes into account patient compliance and adherence and revealed preferences of physicians and patients. A number of guidelines are available for P&T committees to use in requesting and interpreting clinical and economic information from vendors. One widely used one is available from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading