Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also known as the Earth Summit, was held in Rio de Janeiro June 3–14, 1992, ushering in a new era of global environmental politics. The Earth Summit, held in part to mark the 20th anniversary of the UN Conference on the Human Environment (UNCHE), surpassed expectations in terms of both attendance and influence. With representatives from 178 governments, including 108 heads of state and over 2,400 representatives from nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), the Earth Summit was the largest event of its kind to date. The Earth Summit was also novel in that over 17,000 people attended the parallel NGO Forum, something that made headlines around the world, as 8,000 journalists provided daily coverage of both the official conference and the parallel forum. The attendance of so many heads of state, and the extensive press coverage in turn, raised the profile of the agreements signed at the Earth Summit, especially the Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. The Earth Summit also further legitimated the participation of NGOs in international negotiations and “sustainable development” as the organizing principle for national development strategies and multilateral treaties. Finally, principles and funding mechanisms formulated in the expansive Agenda 21 have had far-reaching effects on the domestic politics of most countries, as well as on international environmental politics.

UNCED History

The foundations for the UNCED were established 20 years earlier at the UNCHE held in Stockholm in 1972. Preparations and then negotiations at UNCHE were marked by a split between industrialized countries and developing countries, many of whom had recently gained independence from colonial powers. Industrialized countries pushed for regulations on transboundary air and water pollution, arguing that the origins of environmental problems were the same regardless of economic system or level of industrialization, and that developing countries stood to gain the most from measures to protect the environment. Developing countries countered that air and water pollution were primarily caused by industrialized countries, which should thus bear the economic burdens associated with pollution mitigation. Moreover, developing countries were very concerned that an environmental logic would be used to restrict their development, and that assistance for environmental protection would take the place of development aid. Negotiations at UNCHE were not able to overcome these fundamental conflicts, though they did succeed in putting global environmental issues on the international political agenda, as well as leading to the formation of the United Nations Environment Programme, the first United Nations secretariat with headquarters located in a developing country.

The conflict between environmental protection and economic development continued throughout the 1970s. In the early 1980s, the United Nations General Assembly established the World Commission on Environment and Development to formulate a long-term agenda. The resulting Brundtland Commission produced the widely influential report Our Common Future in 1987, solidifying the call for linking environmental protection efforts with social and economic development. In particular, the Brundtland report focused on intergenerational equity, stating that development was sustainable only if the needs of future generations are not compromised in meeting the needs of the present.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading