Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Coined by scholar Ulrich Beck, the risk society thesis is that risk is a key organizing principle in contemporary society. Beck's Risk Society; Towards a New Modernity (1992), and subsequent World Risk Society (1999), has become a significant and highly relevant synopsis of the interaction of humanity and its environment and the consequence this has for institutional change and political dynamics. The underlying message of World Risk Society is that an older industrial society, whose basic principle was the distribution of goods, is being replaced by an emergent risk society that is structured around the distribution of hazards.

This analysis distinguishes between three epochs of modernity, which include premodernity, industrial or first modernity, and finally, second or late modernity, which is defined as a reflexive modernity. It is the transitional stage between the latter two epochs of modernity that are the focus of Beck's work.

Epochs of Modernity

In general, the concept of modernity has been employed as a shorthand diagnosis for a broad set of social relations and processes that typify Western societies. Beck's understanding of modernization is representative of established observations of this period. Historically, modernization refers to the organization of social life that emerged from Western Europe during the 17th century. Technological advancements in many areas, including transportation, communications, and weaponry enabled early modern nations to establish colonizing empires. From the epicenter of Western Europe, modern practices radiated outward, conflicting with and ultimately subsuming, or juxtaposing, traditional forms of social organization.

Among others, Beck tells us that the processes of modernization are built on the Enlightenment notions of progress and scientific certainty, which holds a hegemonic position in creating the knowledge on which progress is founded. During this time, humanity is raised above other species, separating them from the natural global processes, to which previous generations of humanity had been bound. Centralized human settlement and intense urbanization produced new forms of social interaction and innovation, giving legitimacy to the purity of the scientific process.

Even in the latter stages of the 19th century, following intense industrialization when issues such as environmental despoliation, disease, and hunger were being witnessed on a massive scale, science was, paradoxically, still empowered to solve these problems. Built on this faith in science, unitary political structures in the form of nation-states developed policies that jostled for increasing access to, and control of, the world's resources. Moreover, there was the increasing success of a capitalist market system that was a driving force of political philosophy in the modern age. Here, the acquisition of wealth was abstracted from its environmental base through the development of a monetary system.

For Beck, however, the 21st century's recognition of the different forms of risks caused by unfettered scientific development and its inappropriate application by political structures was creating space for another form of modernity. According to Beck, modernity had turned inward and was questioning its most central tenets, creating a stage of reflexive modernity. Reflexive modernity is a complex collection of processes operating at many different levels within society. Reflexive modernity is a recursive turning of modernity on itself, in essence becoming its own theme.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading