Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

A charette is an intensive design methodology used primarily in urban and land use planning. It rose to prominence with the New Urbanism movement in the 1990s but emerged as a recognized practice in the late 1960s. The charette process evolved as a part of a larger reaction against modernist architecture and planning's claims to “know best” how to shape an ideal urban society through the constructed forms of the city. In its idealized form, the charette process eschews hierarchical, objectivist, comprehensive planning and embraces inclusive, situated, communicative planning. Recognizing that architecture and planning are practices that embody ethics within physical spaces, the charette process seeks to democratize the planning and development of towns and cities through the inclusion of affected persons and interest groups in the design and critical review process. The point is not merely to seek approval for design precepts already enumerated but to engage persons’ creative contributions in the formation of what is to be the physical foundation of their community. However, architects, planners, and developers sometimes refer to an intensive design studio without significant public engagement as a charette. This ambiguity is a result of both the etymology of the term as well as an ambivalence regarding the role of persons and interest groups in city, town, and real estate development.

En Charrette: Etymology and Foundational Practices

The first use of the anglicized term charette comes from the French en charette, literally to be “on the pushcart.” In the 19th and early 20th centuries, senior students at the École des Beaux Arts in Paris would gather their plans and drawings for the term's design project and load them onto pushcarts, on which they were carried from the various ateliers in which students produced work to be judged by a jury at a predetermined deadline. The phrase en charrette came to signify not only the frantic time of loading final presentation works on to the pushcarts and their journey to the jury but also the final weeks of dogged preparation leading up to the last hectic days of production.

Contemporary charettes inherit both the theoretical framing of the Beaux Arts school and its practices of creative production. Beaux Arts architectural training focused on drawing as a means of visualizing architectural form, from production of conceptual sketches to detailed perspective drawings of the finished site; projects and their sites were predominantly urban. In addition to the critical review of the jury, iterative reviews happened throughout the process of design as peers critiqued each other's works. To be en charrette signified collaborative work in the studio with junior colleagues to solve a specific design problem in the face of a looming deadline, amid peers who were also producing their own solutions. Working through the night was typical, even for several nights, as designs were rethought and redone until the presentations were finally loaded on the carts. The pivotal period of gathering and reacting to critical judgment was not at the jury, which was a final evaluation, but, rather, the days of intense work in a shared studio space. At its heart, to be en charrette was to iteratively and collaboratively produce drawings as a means of visualizing the solution to an urban problem.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading