Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Carrying Capacity

Carrying capacity was first described by ecologists in the context of natural ecosystem functioning, but has since been expanded for use in more human-centered applications. Here, the traditional, ecologically focused notion of carrying capacity is described first; then the many parallels between natural and human-made systems, as well as our fundamental dependence on the Earth's ecosystems, are described in detail. Because it has the potential to function as a policy decision–making aide, the differences between the tenets of carrying capacity and those of traditional neoclassical economic theory are also reviewed. The ways in which the concept of carrying capacity can be interpreted for the purpose of gauging the overall sustainability of people's actions and settlement patterns will also be examined. Against the framework created using the concepts described here, particular attention is paid to the sustainability of cities, as determined using purely economic, versus essentially ecological metrics. Although one of many common settlement patterns, cities are of particular interest with regard to sustainability, as they are both the world's economic engines and loci of its most intensive resource use.

Ecological Carrying Capacity

The concept of carrying capacity originated within the field of ecology, where it is often defined in terms of the population of a species that can be maintained by a given habitat indefinitely without causing irreparable harm to the supporting ecosystem.

In the course of its life cycle, each organism present within a given habitat makes demands of the system through the extraction of nutrients and production of wastes; and in so doing, the presence of one species affects other elements of the system. One organism's hunting behaviors, for example, will impact the population levels of prey species. This, in turn, may have repercussions on other predators that rely on that organism for food, as well as on all other elements of the system with which that prey species interacts.

Each element of an ecosystem is linked to the others, either directly or indirectly, and it is because of these myriad interactions and dependencies that ecosystems are frequently described in terms of food “chains” and “webs.” Because of their inherent similarities, individuals of the same species make comparable demands on their supporting ecosystems; therefore, there is a population size above which a population's extraction of resources and introduction of wastes will exceed the system's ability to meet these needs. Simply put, this disequilibrium, which may manifest in altered ecosystem functioning or, in extreme instances, in systemic collapse, occurs because carrying capacity has been exceeded.

Although responsive to internal and external stimuli, different ecosystems possess varying degrees of resiliency. For this reason, harvesting of resources from a system may occur indefinitely if it is done in such a way as to allow for regeneration and does not put undue pressure on other related components of the system. Similarly, naturally occurring associations of organisms and their surroundings can absorb some level of pollution without significant deleterious effects. These productive and absorptive capacities are central to predicting carrying capacity because once they are exceeded, functional breakdown can quickly occur as essential elements of the tightly coupled system are compromised.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading