Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Best Management Practices (BMPs) comprise a range of different concepts and definitions, with varying emphases depending on the primary interests or perspectives of the definers. Environmental BMPs, however, share in common that they are geared toward real (or apparent) reduction or elimination of detrimental impact on the natural environment (such as pollution or habitat destruction). Though references to the general idea of BMPs can be found as far back as the late 19th century, the concept did not gain serious traction until it appeared in the revised 1977 Clean Water Act (though it lacked clear definition), and was originally concerned only with water quality. Since then, BMPs have found a variety of uses in agriculture, manufacturing, land maintenance, and animal care, covering the use and protection of everything from water to air, soil, and natural resources.

Common to BMP regulations is that they are primarily concerned with so-called non-point source pollution, that is, pollution that is an indirect result of production or consumption, and that does not have a clearly defined or definable source of origin. But BMPs have by now also found a much more common usage, as in “best practices” to minimize detrimental environmental impact of one's actions, whether they are personal or communal, in production or consumption. Typical for the kinds of rationales given for the creation and implementation of BMPs, the U.S. Department of the Interior states that BMPs are significant in the pursuit of “enhancing quality of life for all citizens through balanced stewardship of America's public lands and resources.” In short, the most fundamental goal of all BMPs is what can best be summarized as pollution prevention, resource conservation, and environmental stewardship.

Basic Uses for Best Management Practices

Ever since the industrial revolution, business interests and environmental concerns seem to have been on a coalition course. The reason is simple: virtually all conventional forms of extraction, manufacture, and disposal are destructive to the natural environment.

Government agencies frequently find themselves caught in the middle of the competing interests of environmentalists and industrialists, seeking to mediate, and attempting to find (or at least appear as attempting to find) some middle way agreeable to both parties. BMPs are a classic example of a political answer to a thorny problem—in this case the problem of how to assist virtually indiscriminate growth in the economy without unduly risking to destroy the natural habitat upon which all life (and business) ultimately depends.

A wide array of increasingly pressing environmental problems—ranging from meat contamination to species extinction, toxic runoffs, smog, and global warming forced the government to intervene in the presumably free market regulating the commercial interactions of citizens in the United States.

While historians and economists can argue about when exactly the point was reached, there is little doubt that by the time of the first Clean Air (1963) and Clean Water (1972) Acts, had the government not begun to provide comprehensive guidelines, regulations, and enforceable restrictions on the use of resources and our natural environment, much of the country today would look like the unregulated slaughterhouses of Chicago vividly portrayed by Upton Sinclair in his 1906 book The Jungle, or the 1969 city of Cleveland where the Cuyahoga River self-ignited due to its toxic contamination with industrial waste.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading