Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Public Administration

The term public administration encompasses a vast range of issues and activities. One way of grasping this diversity is to distinguish between two sets of questions: How public authorities are organized and how they seek to act within societies through making and implementing public policy. In short, public administration is about the state “in action” and “in interaction.” Traditionally the organization and the action of the state have generally been seen as coterminous with the concept of government. Over the last thirty years, however, an increasing number of academics, experts, and practitioners have begun to differentiate between public administration that is government and that which they label governance. According to this view, (Western) societies and economies have been transformed to such an extent that public authorities have been obliged to change both their internal modes of functioning and the way they engage with nonstate actors. More precisely, proponents of the concept of governance consider that it not only encapsulates changes in public administration itself but acts as a catalyst to the transformation of state-society relations.

These contentions about the relationship between public administration and governance will be examined in two parts. The first sets out to discover how and why governance has so frequently come to be used as a narrative with which to describe, and often rationalize, a range of “new” public policies and statesociety relations. The second part of this article looks more closely at how, more recently, governance has been used as a means of explicitly inciting policy and political change. In both parts, the interplay between academic and practitioner usages of governance is highly important. Indeed, in introducing a range of issues that are dealt with in more detail elsewhere in this volume, the principal claim made here is that avoiding confusion between “governance as narrative” and “governance as an agenda” constitutes a central challenge for both public administration as an activity and public administration as an academic discipline.

Governance as a Narrative for Public Administration

As Mark Bevir and Rod Rhodes underlined, public administration can and should be understood in terms of narratives. Such an approach explains social action by identifying the links between beliefs, preferences, intentions, and actions. Indeed, narratives explain actions through analysis of the beliefs and preferences of the actors involved.

From this perspective, governance has most certainly become the dominant narrative within which contemporary public administration has come to be described and analyzed. As such, the term governance synthesizes a series of perceived and real changes in the way public authorities are organized and organize themselves to interact with representatives of civil society. In so doing, governance is simultaneously used to explain new modes of public policy making and implementation. Based on both these sets of observations, a central hypothesis in theories of governance is that contemporary politics features an increasingly wide range of public bodies on the one hand and, on the other, more contact between these bodies and representatives from civil society.

Governance as Coordination within and between Public Authorities

An initial use of the term governance concerns a perceived need for greater intra- and interorganizational coordination.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading