Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Natural Resource Management

Natural resource management refers to the ways in which societies manage the supply of or access to the natural resources upon which they rely for their survival and development. Insofar as human collectives are fundamentally dependant on natural resources, ensuring the ongoing access to or a steady provision of natural resources has always been central to their organization. Historically, this access has been organized through a range of schemes varying in degrees of formality and involvement from the central authorities (or state). Thus, natural resource management goes to the heart of governance, if by governance we mean the regulatory schemes by which societies organize themselves. Specific governance issues include, for example, establishing hierarchies between the different resources or deciding which ones are “strategic” and need to be secured as a priority.

A “natural” resource is one that is afforded by nature without human intervention; hence the fertile lands or the minerals within them, rather than the crop that grows on them, comprise a country's natural resources. Although what is considered a “resource” (or, for that matter, “natural”) has varied over time and from one society to another; resources are riches provided by nature from which some form of benefit can be derived, whether material or immaterial. However, only those natural resources that can renew themselves, and whose exploitation relies on these regenerative capacities, properly necessitate management. For example, oil is not considered a subject of natural resource management, whereas forests are. Management seeks to balance out the demands of exploitation with a respect for these regenerative capacities. Thus, natural resource management, in its generic sense, bespeaks the degree to which societies are embedded in the natural environment, and what is being managed is this basic dependency as much as the resources themselves. More specifically, however, the term natural resource management has historically coincided with the increasing formalization of these schemes of access to (or provision of) natural resources that accompanied the rise of the modern bureaucratic state. The most fundamental challenge to natural resource management was posed by the encounter with the earth's limits: The realization that natural resources, contrary to implicit assumptions, were not in fact in endless supply. This is the challenge that shifted natural resource management from a simple governance issue, concerned mainly with questions of efficient resource allocation, to an issue of environmental governance.

Origins

The emergence of a rational, systematic management of natural resources can be traced back to the phase of accelerated industrialization of the late nineteenth century. In a period of unprecedented industrial growth, the pressures brought to bear on the supply of raw materials and natural resources by an unrelenting demand intensified the need to rationalize their utilization, so as to eliminate an increasingly costly waste and to allocate them more efficiently. This coincided with a broader tendency toward rationalization, a general social pattern identified by the sociologist Max Weber that emerged in modern industrial societies in response to the large-scale reorganization of production, and whereby goal-oriented rationality was increasingly infused into the organization of social activities. Natural resource management was born at the conjunction of rationalization and its twin process of bureaucratization, which yielded the first bureaucracies to manage nature. Of course, there are huge variations in both the rates and degrees to which the different states became involved with questions of natural resource management—the French state, for example, took a heavy hand in forestry management as early as the seventeenth century, when wood became a strategic resource at a time of accelerated, mercantilist (export-oriented) growth that relied primarily on maritime transportation (boats). These local variations aside, overall it took a certain kind of state, the modern bureaucratic state, to steer the exploitation of natural resources toward principles of scientific management. In the United States, natural resource management was made a federal matter for the first time under the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt. At that time, principles of scientific management, which combined notions of rational management with in-depth scientific knowledge of the resource itself, were promoted by key figures such as Gifford Pinchot, the founder of the National Forestry service in 1896 and the Yale School of Forestry, who was supported by Roosevelt himself. In Europe, a similar concern with rational resource exploitation transpired around the same period, for example, at the International Conference on the Exploration of the Sea that assembled in 1899, with northern European countries sharing concerns around maritime exploitation. It was effectively one of the first international conferences on a natural resource management question, and there, too, science was entrenched as a basis for exploitation of the seas, laying the grounds for future arrangement for the management of collective resources.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading