Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Monetary Union

A monetary union involves an agreement between two or more states creating a single currency area. This involves the irrevocable fixation of the exchange rates of the national currencies existing before the formation of a monetary union. Historically, monetary unions have been formed on the basis of both economic and political considerations. A monetary union is accompanied by setting up a single monetary policy and establishing a single central bank, or making the already existing national central banks the integrative units of a common central banking system. Usually, a monetary union involves the introduction of common bank notes and coins. This function, however, might be split among the participating states. They may either be granted the right to issue coins or bank notes on behalf of the common central banking system, or the respective national currencies become denominations of an invisible common currency.

The most prominent and recent example of a monetary union is the creation of a single currency among European Union (EU) countries—the euro. This example demonstrates the interplay of economic and political factors in the process of setting up a monetary union. From an economic point of view, a monetary union helps reduce transaction costs in an increasingly integrated regional market. It also helps increase price transparency, thus increasing inner-regional competition and market efficiency. In addition, a monetary union was seen to be an essential step toward the further political integration of the EU.

A monetary union may also have adverse effects on the participating economies. In the case of the euro, some economists raised doubts about whether the EU could be regarded as an “optimum currency area.” Economic diversity and the inflexibility of labor markets were seen as the major obstacles for EU member states to exploit to the full the benefits of monetary union. Monetary integration was seen to leave some economies particularly vulnerable to asymmetric (external) shocks, as national decisionmakers are no longer in control of nominal interest rates.

As a result, the creation of a monetary union also represents a particular challenge to monetary and economic governance both at the domestic and supranational levels. It raises the question of the institutional design of a common monetary policy and the necessity of a simultaneous integration of macroeconomic policies. Because these issues touch on core aspects of national sovereignty, monetary unions are sometimes associated with the transition of a confederation of states toward a federal system. However, as the example of the European Economic and Monetary Union demonstrates, a centralized monetary policy may be compatible with a decentralized economic policy framework. In this framework, national governments remain solely responsible for economic policies but are required to engage in policy coordination. They also must respect a set of common rules for the conduct of their fiscal policies. This notably includes the rule to avoid excessive government deficits.

UwePuetter

Further Readings and References

De Grauwe, P. (Ed.). (2001). The political economy of monetary union. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Gros, D., & Thygesen, N. (1992). European monetary integration. Harlow,

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading