Groupthink

Groupthink refers to a mode of thinking which reduces the efficiency of collective problem solving within small cohesive groups. To preserve unanimity, members of such a group will try to conform to a perceived group consensus, irrespective of whether or not they may individually believe it to be the optimum solution.

The theory of groupthink was first developed by the social psychologist Irving Janis in his classic 1972 study, Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascos, which focused on the psychological mechanism behind foreign policy decisions such as the Pearl Harbor bombing, the Vietnam War, and the Bay of Pigs invasion.

Janis's attempt to determine why groups consisting of highly intelligent individuals often made bad decisions renewed interest in the study of how group behaviors, biases, and pressures affect group decision making. Groupthink has become a widely accepted theory particularly in the fields of social psychology, foreign policy analysis, organizational theory, group decision-making sciences, and management. As such, the notion was most recently revived to help explain the interpretation of intelligence information regarding weapons of mass destruction before the second Iraq War.

Janis identified a number of structural conditions leading to groupthink, related to the cohesiveness of a given decision-making group, the formal rules governing its decision-making process, the character of its leadership, the social homogeneity of participants, and the situational context they face.

The eight symptoms of groupthink include an illusion of invulnerability or the inability to be wrong; the collective rationalization of the group's decisions; an unquestioned belief in the morality of the group and its choices; stereotyping of the relevant opponents or out-group members; the presence of “mindguards” who act as barriers to alternative or negative information as well as self-censorship and an illusion of unanimity. Decision making affected by groupthink neglects possible alternatives and focuses on a narrow number of goals, ignoring the risks involved in a particular decision. It fails to seek out alternative information and is biased in its consideration of that which is available. Once rejected, alternatives are forgotten and little attention is paid to contingency plans in case the preferred solution fails.

Proposals to prevent groupthink have included the introduction of multiple channels for dissent in decision making, mechanisms to preserve the openness and heterogeneity of a given group and have focused on the specific type of leadership required to prevent groupthink from occurring.

Critiques have underlined that decision-making processes do not always determine eventual outcomes. Not all bad decisions are necessarily the result of groupthink nor do all cases of groupthink end up as failures. In certain contexts, groupthink may also [Page 402]positively enhance members'confidence and speed up decision-making processes.