Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Community Organizing

Community organizing is a method of engaging and empowering people. Its main purpose is to increase the influence of groups historically underrepresented in policies and decision making that affects their lives.

Community organizing is both a tactic to address specific problems and issues and a longer-term engagement and empowerment strategy. Longer-term objectives of community organizing are to develop the internal capabilities and to increase the decision-making power and influence of underrepresented groups.

Community organizing is often a place-based activity, used in low-income and minority neighborhoods. It is also used among common interest-based “communities” of people, such as new immigrant groups, who have limited participation and influence in decision making that affect their lives.

In community organizing, members of communities are organized to collectively act on their shared interests. Saul Alinsky is commonly recognized as the godfather of community organizing. Alinsky emerged as a community organizer in the second half of the 1930s. His thinking about organizing was strongly influenced by the militant labor movement in the United States emerging at the time. Alinsky's approach emphasized: democratic decision making, the development of indigenous leadership, the support of traditional community leaders, addressing people's self-interest, use of conflict strategies, and fighting for specific and concrete results. In the late 1960s and 1970s, many liberals and liberal-leaning foundations embraced his method of community organizing as an alternative to the radical activism and rebellion at the time in U.S. cities.

The focus of Alinsky-type organizing is on strengthening the internal ties among people sharing similar values and interests. Working mainly through established organizational networks, such as churches, these efforts mobilize residents for actions that confront powerful people and institutions in an effort to get them to act differently. In conflict organizing, strong internal community ties are thought to be sufficient to empower people and effect change. In practice, some conflict organizers explicitly reject developing associations with those in power for fear of having group members coopted when sharing responsibilities with people in an advantaged positions.

An alternative approach to conflict-based community organizing is the consensus approach. Consensus organizing emerged in the last decade of the twentieth century. In contrast to conflict organizing, consensus organizing pays attention to the development of strong and weak ties; namely, both the nurturing of internal cooperation among communities of interest and creating working relationships to those in power and with influence. The goal is to create new organizations and leaders that are more broadly rooted, with an emphasis on establishing new positive linkages to government and other decision-influencing institutions.

RossGittell

Further Readings and References

Alinsky, S. (1971). Rules for radicals: A pragmatic primer for realistic radicals. New York: Vintage Books.
Fisher, R. (1994). Let the people decide: Neighborhood organizing in America (
updated ed.
). New York: Twayne.
Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1999). Community organizing: Building social capital as a community development strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452220567
  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading