Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. Bush, in a June 2005 speech delivered to a group of nuclear power plant workers intoned, “The 103 nuclear power plants in America produce twenty percent of the nation's electricity without producing a single pound of air pollution or greenhouse gases.” Experts in the nuclear energy field, both for and against nuclear energy, find this statement lacking credibility. Nuclear energy critics cite the significant amount of greenhouse gases produced by the nuclear fuel cycle in aggregate. Not surprisingly, proponents of nuclear power generation focus on the reactors themselves, which produce nothing but water vapor from the cooling towers.

Nuclear Power and the Environment

As a stand-alone device, nuclear reactors do not emit greenhouse gases. The nuclear reaction is contained and the heat generated is used to boil water to turn turbines and produce electricity. Instead of a chemical reaction, an atomic reaction is required, produced by a process of fission using uranium fuel. Due to the splitting of atoms and the radioactive movement of neutrons, no carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases are produced. However, the byproducts are toxic, radioactive wastes requiring storage for thousands of years. Analyzing the entire nuclear cycle, including the upfront uranium mining and refining, reveals that large amounts of fossil fuels are required. This, in part, is where the greenhouse gases come from. Such steps are also required to produce aluminum. The difference is that aluminum-based products can be recycled and reused in other forms.

With uranium, the atomic alteration it undergoes to boil water cannot be reversed. Like fossil fuels, uranium is a non-renewable resource. Recent reports from the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA) reveal that the mining of easy uranium in places like Saskatchewan, Canada and Australia will run out around 2020, while the cost to extract it rises significantly. This uranium supply aspect of the nuclear cycle is like that of the disappearing petroleum feed stocks.

Another aspect of nuclear power production is the dangerous chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) dumped into the atmosphere during the enrichment of uranium, a complex technique needed to make the uranium suitable for use in fission reactors. It is so complex that only the United States, Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Russia export enriched uranium to other countries for use in their reactors. Regardless of the source, the enrichment process itself produces CFCs, which destroy the ozone layer. Furthermore, the CFC byproducts are 10,000 to 20,000 times more capable of holding heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.

Like the oil industry, the nuclear industry is highly subsidized. This was reinforced in the U.S. Energy Act of 2005, which allocated $13 billion in subsidies. One of the rationales given is that nuclear-generated electricity will wean Americans from dependence on oil and strengthen national security. Looking at electricity generating statistics published by the Department of Energy (DOE) refutes this fallacy. In 2005, petroleum products fueled only 3 percent of electrical consumption. The bulk of the nations petroleum is used for transportation, not for the production of electric power. In this energy-hungry sector, gas-electric hybrids and revitalized electric vehicles are being called upon to reduce petroleum consumption.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading