Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

War has both shaped and reflected global history. The most famous (and still the best) definition of war is from Carl von Clausewitz's On War: “an act of violence intended to compel our opponent to fulfill our will.” We can disaggregate this definition and focus on critical aspects. First and most obviously, war is about violence; it is a particular form of violence dependent on specific technologies and social organization. War requires specific means and the distribution of these means, and their subsequent use has global implications. Second, war is about violence with a purpose; it cannot be understood as an emotional outburst (although sentiments play a role in bellic origins and behavior). It is a political tool used as part of a strategy of power. It is not the province of individuals or even small groups but requires some level of social aggregation. Implied in Clausewitz's definition are two other critical aspects of war: the definition of actors and its legitimacy. War is violent conflict between political authorities or organizations that have achieved the imposition of order on some territory. The right of these institutions to engage in war is a critical part of their claim to such authority. War is practiced by and defines states or, at the very least, aspirants to the status of states.

War in Global History

Understood as the violent conflict between territorial authorities, wars have been arguably the most important factor in the creation of the contemporary global order. In the millennia-long process of their development, wars have evolved in ways that have rewarded certain forms of social organization and particular means of violence. One may trace the advancing social sophistication of human organization through the increasing lethality of war, and one may trace the distribution of global power through the capacity of some societies to more effectively use the political means of destruction. War and global civilization go hand in hand.

The origins of war are the subject of considerable dispute. On the one hand, some argue that war is a universal characteristic of social groups beyond a minimum level of social complexity. On the other hand, some argue that war arises only in particular social, historical, and geographical settings. By consensus, however, we see indication of activities we may call war as early as 10,000 BCE and the concurrent development of urban centers, or ones allowing for the coexistence and coordination of thousands of people. Sidestepping the irresolvable question of how “natural” war may be for human beings, we may note that wherever we see the rise of political units beyond the level of tribal organization, we see war. Whatever the causal order involved, political authority and war are intrinsically linked. The social phenomenon of war helped define the rooting of political authority in control over territory and its fundamental expression in the use of violence. More broadly, the architecture of cities, the rise of monotheistic religion, the hierarchy of gender, and the centrality of private property, to name a few base institutions, are all linked to war.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading