Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The Tobin tax has played a significant role in the global economy. The idea of a tax on financial or currencies transactions—the Tobin tax—has resurfaced and disappeared many times according to the economic crises and the political tensions they brought.

In 1971, the Nobel laureate economist James Tobin (1918–2002) feared that the demise of the Bretton Woods agreements would bring financial instability back to the fore because exchange rates would be exposed to the whim of speculation. He proposed tax currency transactions in order to curb speculative attacks on currencies and improve the autonomy of monetary policy. Tobin considered the revenues as a by-product only and not the primary objective. He explained that, at the time, his proposal sank like a stone in a deep well. However, it was revived each time a financial crisis hit a country or a group of countries, such as Mexico in 1994–1995, East Asian countries in 1997–1998, and most of the planet with the subprime mortgage crisis in 2007–2008. In between, Tobin's initial proposal was refined and adapted to globalized markets thanks to the debate between economists supporting or criticizing the Tobin tax.

A first major innovation is Paul Bernd Spahn's idea of a two-tier currency tax: a low tax when foreign exchange markets are stable and a surcharge when speculative attacks threaten to destabilize currency markets. Whenever the daily exchange rate goes outside a predefined band of fluctuations, the surcharge is applied. Transactions resume when traders accept trading at an exchange rate inside the band. A second major innovation is the idea that the Tobin tax could be established at the regional, or even the national, level and not necessarily at the world level as it was previously believed. This innovation is justified by the way the tax would be collected. Among the various possibilities explored, the tax collection at the settlement of payments appears as the most secure, according to Rodney Schmidt. In each country, the settlement of payments is managed by the central bank and is now totally electronically registered: The buyer and the seller, the intermediaries, their geographical location, the currencies involved, and the exchange rate can be identified, and the tax can be collected automatically by the central bank. All of the necessary information is already there thanks to technical progress.

The Active Role of Nongovernmental Organizations, Trade Unions, and Political Parties

The alter-globalist movement has popularized Tobin's proposal at each world or regional social forum but also through national campaigns to mobilize public opinions. It was successful in building vast coalitions bringing together radical nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) contesting neoliberal politics, development aid NGOs, environmental NGOs, churches, trade unions, and member of parliaments of various political parties. In Europe, the Association for the Taxation of Financial Transactions for the Aid of Citizens (ATTAC) played a special role. It was founded in Paris in 1998 after the monthly French newspaper Le Monde Diplomatique published an editorial calling for the creation of the Tobin tax to curb speculation, which had devastated East Asia, Latin America, and Russia. The revenues would be used to finance development and environmental policies in the poorest countries. Various ATTAC were founded in 40 countries, most of them in Europe. Together with other NGOs, they were successful in getting a law in favor of the Tobin tax adopted by the French Parliament in 2001 and by the Belgian Parliament in 2004. These laws said that the Tobin tax would be implemented in these countries when all other EU member countries would do the same. So, a lot of pressure was exercised on the European Parliament and European Commission in favor of the Tobin tax. One of the strength of the NGOs' network was its capacity to use the work done by academics in favor of the Tobin tax to respond to criticisms of its opponents in these various institutions. However, despite these many efforts, lobbying, and public demonstrations, they were not able to make a major breakthrough because of the refusal of European government and the fierce opposition of the finance industry. A change of attitude appeared in 2004 when France, Brazil, Chile, and Spain decided to establish a technical group on innovative financing mechanisms under the auspices of the UN Secretariat. They were joined in 2006 by 44 countries (now 55) to form the “leading group on innovative financing for development.” These countries are looking for new ways to finance the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Some of them have introduced an “air-ticket solidarity levy” in 2006 to finance UNITAID, a central purchasing facility whose purpose is to counter the major pandemic diseases. In 4 years, US$3 billion were collected. On September 21, 2010, during the United Nations MDG Summit, Japan, Belgium, and France, supported by Norway, Spain, and Brazil, presented a declaration to place a very small levy (0.0005%) on financial transactions for development. It seemed that the NGOs supporting the Tobin tax were close to getting their demands satisfied. A closer look reveals that things are in fact more complicated. It is a levy and not a tax, which means that one of the primary goals—curbing speculation—is abandoned. It may be reactivated with the new financial crisis that began in 2008.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading