Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term secularism was coined at the time of the European Enlightenment to demarcate aspects of society that are separate from religion. Currently, it is used in several different senses. It is a word that refers to (a) secular humanism and atheism, occasionally to (b) the social process of secularization, and finally to (c) a political state-driven project seeking the separation of state and religion. This entry is concerned solely with the third sense, with political secularism.

Broadly speaking, political secularism, anywhere in the world, means a separation of organized religion from organized political power inspired by a specific set of values. In this general sense, secularism is a universal normative doctrine. It does not follow, however, that it comes in one form for all conditions; its constitutive elements can be differently interpreted, thus giving rise to multiple secularisms.

In the mid-20th century, most political observers regarded European-style secularism to be normative for human societies around the world and assumed that it would become the prevailing global ideology of the century. By the end of the 20th century, however, secular states and their underlying ideology, secularism, appeared to be under siege everywhere. They were severely jolted with the establishment of the first modern theocracy in 1979 in Iran. By the late 1980s, Islamic political movements had emerged in Egypt, Sudan, Algeria, Tunisia, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Chad, Senegal, Turkey, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.

Such challenge was hardly restricted to Muslim societies. Protestant movements decrying secularism emerged in Kenya, Guatemala, and the Philippines. Antisecular, Protestant fundamentalism became a force in U.S. politics. Singhalese Buddhist nationalists in Sri Lanka, Hindu nationalists in India, religious ultra-orthodoxy in Israel, and Sikh nationalists in the state of Punjab in India, as well as among diasporic communities in Canada and Britain, began to seriously question secularism.

Even the largely secular-humanist ethos of western Europe did not remain untouched by this public challenge. The migration from former colonies and an intensified globalization has thrown together on Western public spaces pre-Christian faiths, Christianity, and Islam. The cumulative result is unprecedented religious diversity; the weakening of public monopoly of single religions; the generation of mutual suspicion, distrust, hostility, and conflict; and much rethinking on secularism. This is evident in Germany, Italy, and Britain but was dramatically highlighted by the hijab (headscarf) issue in France and Belgium, the 2004 murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh in the Netherlands shortly after the release of his controversial film about Islamic culture, and the controversy over minarets in Switzerland.

Secular and Nonsecular States

Secular states are disconnected from religion at three distinct levels: (1) ends, (2) institutions and personnel, and (3) law and public policy. This distinguishes them from theocracies and states that establish single or multiple religions. In a theocracy, a deep connection between state and religion exists at all three levels. A priestly order directly administers the state by reference to what it believes are ends inscribed in divine laws (e.g., the Islamic Republic of Iran as Ayatollah Khomeini aspired to run it). In states with established religion, an official alliance between state and religion exists. However, a priestly order does not directly govern in such states. If so, a large measure of institutional and personnel differentiation exists in such states. This disconnection, at level (2), between religious and political institutions (also referred to, in some contexts, as church-state separation), goes hand in hand with an overall ideological connection. For example, in the last instance, both sets of institutions share common ends. The state is subordinate to religious ends even though it has its own function, power structure, and internal norms. Because of this primary connection at level (1), there is an automatic connection at (3), the level of law and policy. For example, the revenue collected by the state is available for religious purposes.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading