Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Because the worldwide expansion of population is a global problem, the attempts to control it by governments and nongovernmental international organizations are of vital concern to the field of global studies. Population control policies are usually carried out at the national level, although they are supported internationally because the global phenomenon of population growth is of political, economic, and environmental interest to many states and has a transnational impact. In some cases, these policies are geared toward reducing the numbers of world population, usually for environmental reasons and the scarcity of global resources, and carried out by international organizations such as the United Nations (through the UN Population Fund), the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund.

Globally, the most salient types of population control are (a) control of natural growth of population and (b) control of population movement and immigration. The control of natural growth of population is geared toward the reduction of population growth in the future, through methods designed to reduce fertility rates. These types of policies are highly controversial because they are usually geared toward reducing future population in developing nations, motivated by research that has consistently shown associations between high fertility rates and high rates of poverty. Advocates of population growth control point to the scarcity of world resources on an environmental level. Fertility reduction programs are politically controversial, drawing opposition from varied and rival worldviews: Advocates of women's reproductive rights view these policies as impeding on a protected human right to have a family, while religious communities view the use of contraception and abortion as violations of their religious values. Control of population movement and immigration is geared toward monitoring, reducing, and controlling the movement of population through borders and across territories and states. These policies are mostly enacted and enforced by developed countries, attempting to regulate the number of migrant workers and foreign remittances that share in the distribution of state resources. Origin states view migration as problematic because of the inherent loss of skilled populations who emigrate to affluent states. Both types of population control are heated political debates, but they are asserted for different reasons: Control of population growth is contended for environmental and economic reasons because of the scarcity of global material resources available to sustain a population and the fear that overpopulation will drain the Earth's resources, affecting health, hygiene, and the quality of life of the global population. Control of population movement is contended for political and cultural reasons, particularly definitions of nationalism and belonging, which serve to limit the amount of persons who share the distribution of national resources. In the last decade, the control of population movement has been justified by national security arguments.

Arguments in Favor of Population Growth Control Policies

The primary argument for reduction of natural growth of population is that to guarantee humanity's well-being, sustainability, and progress on Earth, the natural growth of the population must be curbed. Thomas Robert Malthus, in his Essay on the Principal of Population in 1798, was the first to claim that the population growth on planet Earth presented a grave danger to the human race as a result of scarcity of resources, which would inevitably lead to starvation. The Malthusian argument was particularly salient during 1950s-1970s when the fertility rate (the number of children born to a woman in a particular country) was twice as much as the rate of replacement (when the fertility rate replaces the morbidity rate of the population). Since the 1950s, there has been a steady decline in the global fertility rate, in Western countries as well as in developing countries in Asia and Latin America. However, in 1999, the global human population reached 6 billion and experts predict that the population will reach 9 billion in 2050, creating large shortages in supplies. Advocates of population control policies emphasize the environmental dangers of overpopulation, such as increasing demands for timber and fossil fuels, which drive up the price of the raw materials industrialized nations need to import. As forested land is cleared to support a growing population, the world loses a vital mechanism for atmospheric regulation: the forests that produce oxygen and absorb carbon from the atmosphere, helping to slow global warming. However, critics of this view point out that developed countries with stable population actually consume and produce more harmful materials to the environment than the overpopulation in developed countries. The relatively stable U.S. population also contributes more pollution and consumes more resources, per person, than the exploding populations of developing nations, so population changes in the United States have a powerful impact on global health. Although the U.S. population is a small fraction of the world's total, it is frequently said to consume a quarter of the total resources and produce more carbon dioxide and garbage per person than any other nation. Other industrialized countries also contribute far more per person to environmental problems like climate change, ozone depletion, and overfishing than do developing countries.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading