Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Political legitimacy refers primarily to the quality of a political order or a political institution in which power is exercised, an issue that is often contested in the global era. There are two sides to the concept of legitimacy. From a normative perspective, it refers to the normative validity of a political order and its justificatory claims—that is, the Anerkennungswürdigkeit of a political order. From a descriptive perspective, in contrast, the focus is on the societal acceptance of political decisions and political orders, the belief in legitimacy or, in the words of Max Weber, Legitimitätsglaube. Thus, where power is regularly exercised according to justifiable rules and with some consent, we can call it legitimate.

This two-sided understanding of legitimacy includes both normative and descriptive components. It is different from a purely normative theory of justice or just political order in that it is rooted in historical practices of legitimation and the belief of people about legitimacy. The two-sided understanding of political legitimacy is also different from a purely behavioralist view of it, as is the dominant reading of Weber's work on legitimacy. Within this tradition, Seymour Martin Lipset (1960) argues that legitimacy “involves the capacity of a political system to engender and maintain the belief that existing political institutions are the most appropriate and proper ones for the society” (p. 64).

There are two important arguments against the behavioralist view. First, conceived in this way, it strips the social scientist of any competence to make judgments about legitimacy, because she or he is compelled to report data about the beliefs of actors. Second, a merely behavioralist definition of legitimacy shifts the most relevant questions about the relationship between different normative principles and societal support out of the spotlight. In other words, “a given power relationship is not legitimate because people believe in its legitimacy, but because it can be justified in terms of their beliefs” (Beetham, 1991, p. 11). This entry follows an understanding of legitimacy that involves both the normative validity of an order and the beliefs in its legitimacy and focuses on modern legitimacy under conditions of globalization.

What Justifies a Political Order?

What makes a political order or institution justifiable? In answering this question, we may follow David Beetham by distinguishing two dimensions of normative validity. The first dimension includes general principles, which are independent of the content of more specific rules. First, the exercise of political power in a political order involves stratificatory differentiation: There are power-holders and power-takers. Any legitimate order includes an accepted principle of differentiation and thus an element of responsibility of power-holders. In traditional societies, this was typically heritage; in modern societies, it is meritocracy, which adds accountability to responsibility. Second, a legitimate political order must conform to transparent rules. The arbitrary and nontransparent exercise of power, utterly devoid of rules, is illegitimate. In most traditional societies, rules derive from social conventions rather than from law. In modern societies, rules governing the exercise of power in a political order are mostly legal rules of constitutional character. In this sense, legitimacy in modern political orders is based on legality. This component of a legitimate political order has a normative dynamic that is well known in some theories of law. The more powerful the appeal to the principle of rules is, the more they need to respect that principle. In this sense, there is some built-in “movement” in political order, shifting from rule by law to the rule of the law.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading