Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The effective protection of labor rights in the global economy has been a key demand of the international labor movement since before post-World War II trade liberalization put workers in different countries into ever sharper competition with each other. As the preamble of the 1919 Constitution of the International Labour Organization (ILO) states, “The failure of any nation to adopt humane conditions of labour is an obstacle in the way of other nations which desire to improve the conditions in their own countries.” Unfortunately, more than 90 years after the founding of the ILO, violations of labor rights and substandard working conditions are still quite prevalent around the world, for economic as well as political reasons.

Core Labor Rights and Social Standards

The term (core) labor rights refers to those fundamental human rights of workers included in the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. All members of the ILO, regardless of whether they have ratified the respective conventions, are committed to respecting the following: (1) freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining, (2) elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor, (3) effective abolition of child labor, and (4) elimination of discrimination with respect to employment and occupation.

Yet while the core ILO conventions have achieved the status of universally accepted human rights, the ILO has, at no time, been capable of securing their enforcement. Therefore, there have been several attempts to establish more enforceable multilateral labor rights provisions. In 1948, the draft constitution of the stillborn International Trade Organization included an explicit, albeit vague, linkage of trade and social standards in Chapter II, Article 7. No such labor rights provision was included in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which, in Article XX(e), merely extended to member-states the right to discriminate against products made with prison labor. Starting in 1953, the United States has repeatedly proposed a labor rights provision for the GATT, and then the World Trade Organization (WTO). Based on the international labor movement's and especially U.S. industrial unions’ renewed support of a labor rights provision in the GATT/WTO and other trade agreements, subsequent U.S. administrations have been pressured by Congress to advocate labor rights protections in the WTO regime, but the proposal failed to attract support from developing and newly industrializing countries.

The 1996 WTO ministerial conference in Singapore declined responsibility for the rights of the workers who produce goods for international trade. Instead, in their final declaration on December 13, 1996, the ministers referred primary responsibility to the ILO:

We renew our commitment to the observance of internationally recognised core labour standards. The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the competent body to set and deal with these standards and we affirm our support for its work in promoting them. We believe that economic growth and development fostered by increased trade and further trade liberalisation contribute to the promotion of these standards. We reject the use of labour standards for protectionist purposes and agree that the comparative advantage of countries, particularly low-wage developing countries, must in no way be put into question. (WTO,

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading