Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Interest in the nature of genius is a global phenomenon, appearing in many different branches of knowledge from antiquity to the present day. Every culture recognizes that some people are endowed with an innate intelligence and wisdom that can be regarded as “genius.” Confucius, for instance, is the model of a Chinese sage, and Gandhi is often regarded as a guru, someone endowed with wisdom as well as with spiritual authority. The term “genius,” however, came from the Western philosophic tradition, and the concept has evolved from there. For this reason, this entry will focus on the Western roots of the idea of “genius” and its subsequent development during the European Enlightenment, continuing to the present day.

Definitions, Ancient and Modern

Derived from Latin geno (or gigno), genius designates the ancient god who bears responsibility for all that is created through natural processes. Encyclopedist Benjamin Hederich recounts some sources that name Jupiter as the father of genius and the Earth as his mother, and he cites others that consider genius generally to be the offspring of the gods and the progenitor of humankind. Some ancient authorities locate in each and every human being genius as a product of the divine and the human, assigning it the role of guardian angel, the spirit of creative inspiration, or simply as the enlivening soul (animus). Some sources also associate genius with the symmetry manifest in everything that exists and even view in genius the influence of planetary motions on human action. This range of meaning has held steady for millennia. However, in the 18th century during the era of European Enlightenment, genius underwent a definitive transformation as a creative and original force that has remained in the forefront of the debate ever since.

Thinking outside the Box

If Alexander Pope in his An Essay on Criticism (1732) aligned genius with talent and limited it to one discipline at a time when he ventured “One science only will one genius fit: / So vast is art, so narrow human wit,” Ferdinand de Saussure would claim around 1900 that invention requires thinking outside the box when he ventured that one must think daringly to be inventive (pour inventor il faut penser à côté). The phrase suggests that calculative thinking—the kind associated with talent for a specific task and a single discipline—prevents creative thinking and inhibits ingenious transdisciplinary insight because it forecloses openness to the unexpected. Journalist and novelist Arthur Koestler adapted the phrase as the title of his chapter on the limits of logic, “Thinking Aside,” in his The Act of Creation (pp. 145–177). In it, he explores the “forerunners” of Sigmund Freud's thinking on the role of the unconscious in directing our conscious awareness, naming specifically Socrates, Johannes Kepler, Paracelsus, René Descartes, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Immanuel Kant, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, William Wordsworth, William James, and Max Planck. The intermingling of philosophers, poets, and scientists across cultures and the ages underscores the fact that genius is a universal phenomenon and is not synonymous with talent. Thinking outside the box is common to successful scientists and artists alike. Creativity and genius are intimately interrelated.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading