Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Scholarly debates in global studies question the nature of ethnic identity—whether it is immutable and primordial or a social construction shaped by dynamic historical conditions and crafty ethnic politicians. The fate of ethnic identity is also a key issue of debate in the current literature on globalization. Many observers argue that globalization erodes distinct ethnic identities by erasing boundaries that separate people and unleashing forces that would create a “global culture.” Others argue that globalization reinforces exclusive ethnic identities as a more interdependent world exposes more visible difference through more frequent contact. Furthermore, as transnational migration has led to ethnic diversity across the globe, minority ethnic groups have asserted their rights and called on their collective identities in order to build solidarity and to affirm their group's claims to territory and to resources.

Ethnic identity refers to a set of characteristics by which an individual is recognizable as a member of a discrete group united by ties of blood and heritage. Ethnic identity forms the core of national identity for most of the world's people. This entry expands on the definition of ethnic identity and briefly examines the historical relationship between ethnic identity and national identity in the context of global studies. It then surveys alternative explanations for the role that ethnic identity plays in international relations. Finally, it provides an overview of the debates over the effects of globalization on the continued role of ethnic identity in world politics.

Ethnic Identity in World Politics

Ethnic identity refers to an individual's identity with a group of people who share physical and/or cultural traits that signal a blood relationship or a common and enduring descent. Beyond physical similarities, those characteristics include a common language, common ancestry, and shared history, traditions, culture, religion, and/or kinship. When an individual recognizes that he or she shares these characteristics with others, unique individual and personal identities can dissolve, and a common identity with an enduring collectivity can emerge.

Although ethnic identities can manifest themselves simply as distinct cultural practices and institutions of a particular ethnic group (e.g., “Chinese” food, “Latin” music, the “German” language, the “Russian/Greek/Serbian” Orthodox Church), ethnic group identity has had profound political consequences in international relations. In world politics, ethnic identity is often linked with claims to territory believed to be the exclusive “homeland” of a particular ethnic group. The ideology that legitimates this claim is an exclusive nationalist doctrine that is sometimes referred to as “ethnic nationalism.” Ethnic nationalism is the belief that the members of a particular ethnic group are a “nation”—part of an extended family with intrinsic rights to a particular piece of land. They believe that other groups that might inhabit or claim that land do not have those same rights. This belief has particular emotive power, providing ethnic groups with a crucial source of solidarity while it reinforces ethnic identity.

This ethnic nationalist ideal has been largely realized across the globe. In fact, the current system of nation-states is, for the most part, the product of a violent process of ethnic separation or outright destruction of ethnic groups too weak to claim territories of their own. In Europe, after massive population transfers in the wake of the two world wars, every state except two—Belgium and Switzerland—was designated as the territory of a single dominant ethnic group. For much of the developing world, decolonization led to violent ethnic disaggregation and the creation of states with distinct ethnic identities through the exchange or expulsion of local ethnic minorities. Salient examples include India, Pakistan, Kashmir, and Israel. During the Cold War, Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union, and Yugoslavia were the only multiethnic states in the Soviet bloc. But at the end of the Cold War, each of these countries broke apart along ethnic lines, and their separate ethnic populations demanded a homeland of their own. Sometimes they achieved that goal: Czechs and Slovaks achieved it peacefully, Serbs and Croats achieved it through violent conflict. In some areas, ethnic groups have settled for ethnic minority status—with its accompanying limited rights and opportunities—in the homeland of a dominant ethnic group. Examples include Hungarians in Serbia, Russians in Ukraine and the Baltic states, Turks in Germany, and Roma throughout the countries of Europe. Some are still fighting for a separate homeland or control of land claimed by another ethnic group: South Ossetians, Abkhazis, Chechens, Kosovars, and Tibetans are prominent examples of self-identified ethnic groups seeking varying degrees of autonomy that would grant them a homeland of their own.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading