Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The major global changes of the past 2 million years have been driven by planetary biophysical forces. The waxing and waning of the great ice sheets of the Pleistocene (covering 30% of the Earth's surface at their maximum extent), with concomitant falls and rises of sea level, the shifting of climatic belts, and the responses from flora and fauna were all outside the frame of human impact if not of human presence. Environmental change actuated by human activity is very largely a phenomenon of the past 12,000 years, and it has interacted with the “natural” adjustments of climate and biota during the fading of Pleistocene conditions in the Holocene (10,000 years ago to the present).

In the context of human actions, it is legitimate to differentiate between changes that are “worldwide” and changes that are truly “global.” The former are processes that may occur all over the world but remain largely separate in their effects, such as mine wastes or soil erosion or slurry production from intensive animal rearing. The latter refers to processes that involve all of the biophysical systems of the planet, often through transport via the atmosphere or oceans: Greenhouse gases are a prime example. Toxic substances disseminated through the oceans are likely to be taken up into atmospheric aerosols and distributed globally.

Globalization of the Environment

The story of globalization of the biophysical systems of Earth is one of local changes wrought by humans, moving through regional and intercontinental shifts to worldwide metamorphoses and coming to a truly global outreach in which human actions can alter both the upper atmosphere and the deep oceans. Essentially this trend taken over the past 10,000 years is one of coalescence, in which trade and migration have translocated flora, fauna, and environment-impacting processes. The Viking expeditions to both east and west, the development of the Silk Road, and the early modern European contacts with China, Japan, and Indonesia all presaged the higher volumes of translocation and coalescence under the European empires and the subsequent surges of energy-intensive development after about 1950. Yet it can be argued that there has been a countermovement of a fragmentary kind in which sequestration of natural resources and production has been implanted. The development of stratified societies once agriculture was widespread meant that some ecologies were available only to elites; the abstraction of species for specific purposes (e.g., predatory mammals for Roman circuses) disrupted ecosystems and, in modern times, the creation of National Parks and Reserves has meant the fencing-off for management purposes of tracts of land and sea separated from different areas “outside.” In a parallel social sphere, human society has become differentiated from “nature” by centuries of thought and action that emphasized human exceptionalism.

If the label “nature” is allowed for any life on the planet not affected by humans, then the notion of coalescence seems valid. Many species spread out from glacial-era refuges and coalesced with similar species to form ecosystems: Deciduous forests, for example, may have been integrations of streams of different tree species from widely separated refuges. As sea levels rose, barriers between small seas and lakes were breached and successful species colonized both sets of habitats. As related species came into proximity, hybridization took place. This type of process has a parallel in the world of physical phenomena, as the open oceans are in general of the same salinity and the upper atmosphere has the same concentrations of gases. But note that stratification occurs as well: Many ecosystems have very distinct layers of organisms. In Africa, one species of antelope lives off the plants of permanently swamped woodland and the giraffe off the top of acacia trees. Organic evolution means that speciation is a continuous, although intermittent, process and is especially noticeable in isolated places such as small islands long separated from the nearest mainland. This was the process behind the varieties of tortoise and finch that attracted Charles Darwin's attention.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading