Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The significance of economic crises to global studies is well illustrated by the global financial crisis that started in the summer of 2007, catching the world by surprise. As money markets froze and banks stopped lending to businesses, many politicians and policymakers refused to acknowledge the significance of the developments. They thought the effects could be confined to mortgage lending in the United States, that it could be isolated in the financial sector of advanced industrial economies, and that it would have little impact on real economic performance of the developing world. When financial markets finally bottomed out in March 2009, the scale of the disaster was only just beginning to emerge. The financial crisis had become an economic crisis, and the whole world was implicated. Moreover, economists estimated that it would take years to recover from the effects—particularly as these are measured in terms of income and employment.

Both the surprise and the ill-preparedness of politicians and policymakers when confronted with the events of 2007 through 2009 highlight the bias toward automatic adjustment mechanisms and assumptions about efficient markets that continue to be dominant in macroeconomics. The basic premise is that economic cycles are driven by external shocks. Some outside actor or event perturbs the otherwise stable economic system and tips it out of balance until automatic adjustment mechanisms can restore equilibrium. By implication, the size of the deviation is a function of the size of the shock or the fragility of the system. Because the initial shock appeared to be small and the system robust, it is small wonder that the extent of the crisis caught politicians and policymakers by surprise—which is essentially the point made by former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan when he was called to testify before the U.S. Congress.

Endogenous Cycles

There is an alternative understanding of economic crisis, which runs parallel to the conventional wisdom but which supports very different assumptions about how the economy operates. Hyman Minsky's work offers a good illustration. According to his financial instability hypothesis, economic crises are endogenous to the psychology of market participants, particularly in the financial sector. During periods of consolidation, these market actors are conservative and risk averse. They are content to accept low returns on their investments in order to avoid the possibility of losing the principal (which is the money they invest). Over time, however, these actors become more competitive and more self-confident. Through experimentation with risk and financial innovation, they discover the potential rewards available from higher (and compounded) rates of return. They also learn that the cost of risk aversion is relative failure even if profits remain stable in absolute terms. As then Citibank chairman Chuck Prince put it shortly before the crisis struck in 2007, “so long as the music is playing, you have to get up and dance” (quoted in Nakamoto & Wighton, 2007, para. 4).

Over time, Minsky argues, this combination of competitiveness and self-confidence leads to a significant underpricing of risk—not just by a single actor, but across the financial system as a whole. Meanwhile, ever increasing numbers of actors in the real economy have been given access to, and so become dependent on, substantial volumes of credit (or leverage). The fragility of the system increases as a result. At a certain point this system simply tips over, as the underlying risk of the assets takes its toll on investment returns and financial actors wake up to the realization that their positions are undervalued. At this point, however, it is difficult to unwind individual positions without undermining the system as a whole. Financial institutions begin a scramble to consolidate their balance sheets only to spark a massive contraction in credit markets. Lending standards move sharply higher even as lending volumes fall. Nonfinancial firms and households are forced to pay down their debts (de-leverage), and activity in the real economy grinds to a halt.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading