Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The idea of a transnational community is based on a cross-border network of nonstate actors (or a “beyond border” network, as the prefix trans implies). These communities developed within a context of capitalist globalization, itself facilitated by the development of both information technology and relatively affordable and efficient means of international travel. The idea developed out of scholarship in two main areas, the first being transnational labor migration (and associated family reunion migrations) and the second, and more recent, being Internet-facilitated transnational civil society networks, often activist networks, grouped around global(ized) identity politics (including professional identities) or shared political projects.

The defining characteristics of transnational communities—and whether, and how, they differ from past migrant communities or other forms of transnational interaction—have been much debated. From these debates emerges a series of five definitional parameters, conditions of transnational interaction that are necessary for a transnational community to be said to exist: First, its actors must already be constituted as large groups that are identifiable as specific communities having a sociopolitical identity within national contexts—postmigratory minorities or other identity or interest groups. Second, the transnational interactions of these groups are both voluntary and reciprocal. Third, the interactions are associated with a bidirectional (or multidirectional) mobility of persons, resources, and ideas—virtual and/or physical—that is perceived as characteristic or representative of the communities in question. Fourth, the transnational interactions in question add dimensions to the nationally based communities that they otherwise would not have had, whether in cultural, socioeconomic, or political terms. Finally, to be constitutive of transnational communities, the interactions must form patterns that are sustained over time rather than being individualized, idiosyncratic, or temporary phenomena.

Labor Migration

The first understanding of a transnational community—that associated with the effects of labor migration—is clearly tied closely to both ethnic belonging and binational identifications with the idea of “home” as being connected simultaneously with the country of origin and the present and/or past country or countries of residence. It could be argued that such transnationalism existed well before the application of the term transnational community to these groups, and indeed it goes back to the beginnings of transnational labor migration, whether within colonial, postcolonial, or noncolonial contexts. A closer look, however, reveals that prior to the 1990s, when the concept of transnational communities started to gain currency in academic circles, transnational migrant communities did not entirely fit the five criteria outlined. Some were perceived as only temporary by both country of origin and host country and, indeed, by the migrants themselves. This is the case, for example, of many so-called postcolonial migrants of the first generation: Algerian workers in France, Turkish workers in Germany, Mexican workers in the United States, or Filipino workers in North America, the Middle East and East and Southeast Asia. Or, if permanently resettled, migrants were not particularly mobile, either physically or culturally, as in the case of interwar British migrants who traveled to Australia on assisted passages, or postwar Greek or Italian migrants. It was generally assumed that postmigratory communities would assimilate into the host society and culture (even if they also inevitably became agents of hybridization or transculturation within the host country). Or the transnational interaction has not been sustained within a perceivable network of reciprocal transactions adding new dimensions to the communities in question that would not have otherwise occurred within national borders. Or the migration was largely forced, as in the case of refugee migration and slave migration (whether we are speaking of colonial slavery or more modern forms such as trafficking in women for prostitution or domestic service): In this case, the term diasporic communities, or simply diasporas, is usually more appropriate.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading