Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In a global context, there is no single concept of charity. Charity, as it is known to those nations belonging to the common law tradition, is defined by law rather than by religion. In that respect, it is different from its counterpart zakat and sadaqa in Islamic culture and from tzedakah in Judaism. It differs, also, from its equivalent in other Christian societies that are under civil law jurisdictions. (See the entry on Legal Systems in this encyclopedia.)

The word charity in a legal context differs from popular usage, which can range from its wider sense of “the good affections between persons” to its restricted sense of “relief of the poor”—often the deserving poor. It is also distinguished legally from “benevolent” and “philanthropic” purposes, which are regarded as having meanings that are narrower or broader than that permitted in law by “charitable purposes.”

Background

Charity, as a social construct and legal concept, is confined to and defined by the common law. It dates from the Statute of Charitable Uses 1601 in England (43 Eliz. 1. Cap. 4), which laid the legislative foundations for the development of modern charity law. Others have traced the origin of the laws of charity back to Judeo-Christian traditions molded by the arrangements of the Catholic Church and its fraternities and reconfigured by Protestant theology as exemplified by a 14th-century poem The Vision of Piers Plowman, which closely resembles the Statute of Charitable Uses. There are intriguing similarities to the Hindu math, and returning crusaders sometimes established institutions, later regarded as charitable, which incorporated notions from the Islamic waqf.

The preamble to the Statute of Charitable Uses 1601 defined charity in terms of the following charitable purposes:

Releife of aged impotent and poore people, some for Maintenance of sicke and maymed Souldiers and Marriners, Schooles of Learninge, Free Schooles and Schollers in Universities, some for Repaire of Bridges Portes Havens Causwaies Churches Seabankes and Highwaies, some for Educacion and prefermente of Orphans, some for or towardes Reliefe Stocke or Maintenance of Howses of Correccion, some for Mariages of poore Maides, some for Supportacion Ayde and Helpe of younge tradesmen Handicraftesmen and persons decayed, and others for reliefe or redemption of Prisoners or Captives, and for aide or ease of any poore Inhabitantes concerninge paymente of Fifteenes, setting out of Souldiers and other Taxes.

Thereafter, neither a government nor a court would regard a purpose as charitable unless it appeared on that list or could be defined as coming within “the spirit and intendment” of the preamble.

The concept was imposed by default in most of the British colonies, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, India, and Hong Kong. The law has developed through judicial precedent with most of the 60 or so common law jurisdictions having varying degrees of reference back to developing English precedents. The most notable of these was the case of Commissioners for Special Purposes of Income Tax v Pemsel [1891] AC 531 (Pemsel's case) in which the Preamble's disparate items were distilled into four “heads” of charity: relief of poverty, advancement of education, advancement of religion, and other purposes beneficial to the community. In addition, to be charitable, a purpose had to benefit the public. Only since the turn of this century has there been significant proposed and actual statutory intervention in the United Kingdom and some former colonies.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading