Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Rather than attempting to develop a typology of the relations between church and state—at the risk of comparing situations without taking into account the often profound discrepancies between their components—this entry addresses a specific form, the modern Western state, and its relations with religious groups and institutions. This form remains today and often is taken for a universal paradigm, especially in developing countries that have looked to the West for models of political organization. It was the Western concept of the secular nation-state that gave rise to the worldwide adoption of the term state with a political connotation.

The state is characterized by an impersonal power, distinct from the person of the governor. Over time, relations of authority gradually became detached from the personal relationship of leader to subject and came to be based on preestablished rules that apply to all and whose execution is guaranteed by the administrative apparatus often described as bureaucracy.

The role of Christianity in the process that led to the development of the Western notion of the state remains one of the great questions of modern political philosophy. It should be considered with two things in mind: (1) the way in which the construction of the state is a potential development of Christianity and (2) the way in which the state has assumed its modern guise by emancipating itself from this religion and its institutions.

Religion and the Shaping of the Modern State

The expansion of Christianity occurred with the support of imperial Roman power but would never eradicate the initial duality that came from the conditions of its birth in the margins of Roman power and its structures. Both the alliance made with the Church to constitute the pedestal of the medieval monarchies and the rivalry at the highest level between religious and political powers, the Holy See and the Christian Empire, presuppose the definition of two distinct spheres: temporal and spiritual. And if the emergence of the territorial state in the Middle Ages is attributable to many other factors, first and foremost the requirements of war and its financing, its existence was reinforced by the struggle of the monarchs against Rome.

In its nation-state form, the European state also owed a great deal to the effects of the Reformation. The first reaction to the rupture of Western Christian unity was an attempt to remain loyal to the principle of a sole religion as a national cement—already one of the principal driving forces of the conversion of pagan monarchies to Roman Catholicism since the beginning of the Middle Ages. The Treaty of Augsburg in 1550 adopted the saying cuius regio eius religio and engaged a whole portion of Europe in the process of “confessionalization” by creating a mosaic of homogeneous political groups held together largely by an attachment to the same religion.

This homogeneity, however, never became complete, and the war continued to tear Europe apart. The Peace of Westphalia in 1648 decreed the break with the old principle. It brought to an end a century of religious wars by accepting religious pluralism among the European states. Henceforth, the main role of the state would be to guarantee the coexistence rather than the salvation of the populations and their religions. The creation of a diversified and specialized administration and bureaucracy characteristic of the modern state would use the services of many clerics and especially their mastery of the written language, but the sphere of its activity and the increase of its capabilities were applied to domains beyond any spiritual preoccupations.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading