Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The common understanding of a “disaster” assumes that some spectacular event has occurred in a particular time and space. Such a perspective is limiting because some disasters, such as famines and epidemics, or creeping environmental disasters (e.g., desertification, water depletion of lakes) involve diffuse processes occurring over long durations.

For this reason, it is best to think of a disaster in more general terms, as the convergence of sociopolitical and biophysical processes that results in an event in which there is severe physical damages and a disruption of the routine functioning of a community and/or ecosystem. By this definition, all disasters have human and material dimensions. It is particularly important to recognize this dual nature of disasters when considering how certain populations are more vulnerable than others to the effects of a disaster.

For example, analyses of the impacts of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans, Louisiana, in 2005, and the heat wave on Chicago, Illinois, in 1995, reveal how certain marginalized communities were more heavily impacted than other groups because of the way the cities were physically and socially segregated by race and income. Similarly, analyses of the 1984 Union Carbide chemical leak disaster in Bhopal, India, reveal how those lowest on the economic scale experienced the highest fatality rate because the shanty town conditions in which these victims resided led to greater and more direct chemical exposures.

The Disaster Management Cycle

The disaster management cycle describes a continuum of interlinked activities aimed at the reduction of risk before disaster onset and the pursuit of postdisaster recovery efforts. It is a cycle because what is learned during the recovery phase can be used to produce more effective risk-reduction activities for similar disasters that may occur in the future. The disaster management cycle consists of five parts. The recovery phase consists of 1.) response, 2.) rehabilitation, and 3.) reconstruction activities, while the reduction phase involves 4.) mitigation and 5.) emergency preparedness. Mitigation and emergency preparedness are complementary. The former involves those measures intended to reduce the vulnerability of places to disaster and to reduce the disaster impacts. Mitigation includes such things as the enforcement of building and land use regulations, the control of hazardous substances, and the implementation of safeguards to protect critical infrastructure elements such as power supplies and communications networks. The overall objective of emergency preparedness is to ensure that appropriate systems, procedures, and resources are in place to provide prompt and effective assistance to disaster victims. In essence, it involves those measures that enable organizations, communities, and individuals to rapidly and effectively respond to disasters. The emergency preparedness component includes the formulation of disaster plans; the special provision for emergency action (i.e., evacuation plans, temporary safety shelters, the mobilization of relief agencies, emergency warning, and communication systems); and public education/awareness programs and training programs (i.e., practice exercises and drills). Although related to other stages of the disaster management cycle, preparedness measures tend to be more strongly oriented toward action by organizations such as police and fire departments, utility companies, hospitals, social service agencies, military, mass media, and nongovernmental agencies.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading