Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Geographic information systems are concerned with the display and analysis of spatially located data. It therefore follows that an understanding of the coordinate systems in which data are expressed is central to the correct interpretation of any analysis carried out. There are two principal aspects to this: The first is consistency. There may be differences (either obvious or subtle) between the coordinate systems used by two different data sets, and bringing them into the same system is a necessary first step before analysis of data can take place. The second aspect can broadly be classed as computational: Each different method of expressing coordinates has its limitations in the ease with which basic operations (such as distance between points or areas of polygons) can be carried out and the extent to which the values obtained will be distorted from their real-world equivalents.

This entry is primarily concerned with threedimensional coordinate systems and with those where horizontal values are given in a separate system to the vertical. There is some discussion of different height systems, without straying too far into specialist engineering aspects. The main focus is on coordinate systems that are used on land, but bearing in mind the increasing importance of combining data sets across the coastal zone boundary, some indication is given of how marine data sets differ from those collected on land

Coordinates Based on Models of the Earth's Shape

The most basic approximation to the shape of the earth is that it is a sphere of approximate radius 6,400 km. Upon the surface of this sphere, coordinates may be defined in terms of the latitude (the angle from the equatorial plane) and longitude (the angle around from a prime meridian, most commonly, but not exclusively, the Greenwich meridian). This establishes a basic two-dimensional coordinate system, which may be expanded to a three-dimensional system by the addition of the height of a point above the sphere. Such systems are generally referred to as geographic coordinates.

A further refinement of the approximation to the true shape of the earth is to model it as an ellipsoid or, more correctly, an ellipsoid of revolution. This may be visualized as a flattened version of the sphere, in which the distance between the poles is less than the distance between points on opposite sides of the equator but rotational symmetry is maintained. The ellipsoid is usually defined in terms of a parameter that expresses its overall size, the semimajor axis, and one that expresses its shape or degree of flattening. The latter may be either the semiminor axis (the distance from the center to one of the poles) or the flattening or the eccentricity. It is important to note that all three of these definitions are interchangeable: That is, a coordinate system may be based on an ellipsoid that is defined in terms of its eccentricity, but a particular software package may require the flattening as input. In such a case, it will be necessary to refer to one of the standard formulae to convert between parameters.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading