Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Although the concept of spatial decision support systems (SDSS) has been around for approximately 40 years, it was not until the early 1990s that SDSS found a wider recognition in geography and geographic information science (GIScience). The development of SDSS has been associated with the need to expand geographic information system (GIS) capabilities for tackling complex spatial decision problems. Over the past two decades, the SDSS concept has evolved into a field of research, development, and practice that is made up of many different approaches and frameworks, among which are Collaborative SDSS (CSDSS), Group SDSS (GSDSS), Intelligent SDSS (ISDSS), Participatory GIS (PGIS), Public Participation GIS (PPGIS), Spatial Knowledge-Based Systems (SKBS), Spatial Multi-Agent Systems (SMAS), and Spatial Planning Support Systems (SPSS). A broader perspective suggests that all these spatial information systems have a common aim: to improve the performance of decision makers, managers, and citizens when they confront spatial decision problems.

Defining SdSS

SDSS is an interactive, computer-based system designed to support a user or group of users in achieving higher effectiveness in decision making while solving a semistructured spatial decision problem. The essence of the SDSS concept is captured by the following three terms: (1) semistructured spatial problem, (2) effectiveness of decision making, and (3) decision support.

Any decision-making problem falls on a continuum that ranges from completely structured to unstructured decisions. Most real-life spatial decision problems can be found somewhere between these two extremes. Such decision problems are called semistructured (e.g., location-allocation problems, site search and selection problems, land use suitability evaluation, transportation problems, environmental impact assessment, plan/policy evaluation, etc.). The structured part of the semistructured problem may be amenable to automated solution by the use of a computer, while the unstructured aspects are tackled by decision makers. Although SDSS may increase the efficiency of the data-processing operations, the primary aim of the system is to improve the effectiveness of decision making by incorporating decision makers’ knowledge and experience into computer-based decision-making procedures. Central to the concept of SDSS is the interaction of the user(s) with a computer-based system containing a set of tools for analyzing spatial and nonspatial data and for modeling spatial decision problems. SDSS integrates previously separate tool sets into a unified whole more valuable than the sum of the parts.

Components of SdSS

A number of frameworks for designing SDSS have been proposed in the past two decades or so. In general, the SDSS concept is based on the DDM (dialogue, data, and model) paradigm. The way the three components are integrated depends on the philosophy behind the design strategy (e.g., a system for supporting a single user vs. that for group decision making), the types of decision problems (e.g., operational vs. strategic decisions), and the models incorporated into the system (e.g., optimization vs. simulation models). Despite these differences, a well-designed SDSS should have a balance among three sets of capabilities in the areas of data, modeling, and dialogue (Figure 1).

Figure 1 The components of SDSS

None
Source: Authors.
Note: DBMS = database management system; MBMS = model base management system; DGMS = dialogue generation and management system.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading