Socialism and Geography

Forms of Socialism

As a result of the diverse uses of the term socialism, it has often been confused with the term communism. Commonly, these two terms have been considered synonymous: They have both been [Page 2570]used to describe a social system structured contrary to the logic of capitalism, namely, a system in which the means of production are not privately owned and material interests do not prevail over the common interest. In practical terms, both socialism and communism share this advocacy of the common interest; both bodies of knowledge critique the social and territorial injustices of capitalism. Yet regardless of their similarities, socialism and communism are not synonymous. Socialism is a necessary precondition to achieving full communism, but there is a fundamental difference between socialism and communism. The essential distinction between the two concepts lies in the difference between common ownership and state ownership. In socialism, social justice and equality, and thus a better and fairer society, are realized through a social system based on common (i.e., public) ownership of the means of production. Communism aims to consolidate socialism through state ownership of the means of production. Therefore, communism represents a new form of society where human beings overcome material constraints. In that context, communism is the maximum expression of socialism, and in classical Marxist ideology, socialism serves as the transition to communism.

However, the diverse use of the term socialism not only has generated a blurred line between socialism and communism but has also caused a division within socialist theories, writings, ideas, and beliefs. The most important of these socialist divisions are utopian socialism, democratic socialism, Leninist socialism, and Marxist socialism. In utopian socialism, there is unity between the individual subject and the collective object. This interpretation of socialism is based on the principle of cooperation. The result of utopian socialism is not only a social system in which the means of production are collectively owned but also a system in which social and economic life is driven by the collective.

On the other hand, democratic socialism tries to find a common ground between revolution and electoral means. Essentially, this interpretation of socialism aims to reform capitalism through state regulations that work to neutralize or remove the social injustices produced by capitalism. In other words, democratic socialism does not seek to completely and radically eradicate capitalism but rather to reform it and make it more socially sensitive. Social justice can be attained through state welfare policies that incorporate a mixed economy with elements of both socialism and capitalism, as is found in many European welfare states, particularly in Scandinavia.

...