Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

All production and consumption require the use of natural resources. Resource economics seeks to determine the optimal extraction rate of these resources. Key to the determination of optimality is the need for extracting firms to balance the benefits that accrue today against the costs and benefits of leaving the resources for a later time.

Resource economists propose that nonrenewable resources should be valued differently from goods that can be regenerated or produced, because the former can be extracted only once. Developing this idea further, Harold Hotelling showed that the scarcity rent rate, which is the opportunity cost of using resources today, would rise at the rate of interest. The limited ability of renewable natural resources to regenerate themselves and the potential for stocks to be depleted below recovery levels need to inform their use over time. Depending on the resource type, various rules for optimality have been derived, such as the Faustmann rule for forestry resources or the concept of maximum sustained yield for fisheries. The Faustmann rule determines an optimal timber resource rotation age through optimization of the net present values of all revenue flows; it states that an optimal rotation age will occur when the marginal benefit and marginal cost of delaying harvest are equal. Similarly, the maximum sustainable harvest for fisheries assumes a steady-state stock size, which occurs at the point where the net natural growth rate is at its maximum. This point is called the maximum sustained yield.

Issues in Determining Optimal Extraction Amounts

Nonrenewable resource models have been criticized because little empirical support exists for the Hotelling rule and in part because, as Matthias Ruth suggested, the model does not account for individual firm characteristics. Renewable resource models have been criticized for their inability to provide meaningful advice to resource managers, as well as for how resource economics values the benefits provided by natural resources. Renewable resource models vary according to the biological characteristics of the resource. For instance, biomass stock models for fisheries are a function of species population, carrying capacity, and growth rates. However, growth rates, selling price, and efficiencies of fishing operations, as well as other biological factors, are typically considered exogenous in calculating the optimal harvest for renewable resources; because of their noninclusion, the applicability of the models for use by resource managers is limited.

Costanza and Daly proposed that renewable resource ecosystems not only yield goods through their harvest but, if left in place, provide services as well, such as erosion control or water catchments. In choosing an optimal extraction path, the costs of extraction, including the impacts on the local environment, have been largely explored. However, the benefits of leaving the resource in situ have predominantly been ignored, and ideally, the costs and benefits should be calculated simultaneously.

It has been argued that in calculating an optimal extraction path, the impacts of human actions on ecosystems are often overlooked. For example, the impact of the intensity and duration of extractive actions are not accounted for in calculating annual extraction amounts. It is possible, under one set of assumptions in which the needs of an ecosystem are overlooked, to arrive at an extraction path that is spread over many years, placing constant pressure on the resource. Alternatively, taking the ecosystem's needs into consideration, a more intensive extraction path may be selected with less overall disruption to the natural habitat.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading