Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) is the use of geographic information systems (GIS) in efforts to broaden public involvement and influence in matters such as public policy, urban planning, environmental management, and rural development. Geographers engage with PPGIS as both a topic of academic research and an applied practice. While the roots of PPGIS are diverse, the term itself emerged in response to debates in the 1990s over the social, ethical, and political implications of GIS. Three related concerns, in particular, have had a lasting influence in the trajectory of PPGIS research and practice: (1) the antidemocratic implications of the growing role of GIS in spatial governance and decision making due to inevitable disparities in access to data, technology, and expertise; (2) the ways in which the rigid data and representational structures of conventional GIS privilege and legitimize particular kinds of spatial knowledge while marginalizing others; and (3) the role of social, economic, and political power in shaping the social construction of GIS technologies and institutionalized practices. PPGIS scholars seek out ways to progressively address these problems in practice. Described below are three general approaches to PPGIS: (1) participatory GIS, (2) collaborative decision support GIS, and (3) Web-based grassroots GIS. Each is distinct with regard to the “public” it serves, the forms of “participation” it facilitates, and the objectives it seeks to bring about.

Participatory gis

The first approach, often labeled participatory GIS (PGIS), involves explicitly working to empower groups that are marginalized rather than facilitating greater involvement among the public at large. Such efforts are often rooted in the theory and methodology of participatory action research, in that the GIS scholars and practitioners work with community members to both examine a social problem and work to create social change. For example, Trevor Harris and Daniel Weiner use the term community-integrated GIS to describe their work with local communities in South Africa to examine and transform postapartheid land reform policies. The authors acknowledge that GIS remains an “expert system” and cannot be under the control of community members, who do not have the capacity to direct the research themselves. Nonetheless, their community-based research methods explicitly focus on democratizing participation, broadening access to spatial data, incorporating local knowledge, and surfacing (rather than suppressing) the conflict inherent in spatial decision-making practice. In other words, to the extent possible, GIS is not used to impose a particular spatial framework that structures how reality can be represented. Rather, it is used as a way to juxtapose multiple and potentially conflicting realities that reflect the socially differentiated perspectives of participants.

Scholars and practitioners have developed several specific methods that can be used to facilitate PGIS research. These include participatory 3D (three-dimensional) modeling, photo mapping, sketch mapping, and resource mapping. In general, these methods are designed to enable low-cost and inclusive participation for community members who may not have computer literacy or access. Such methods also allow for the flexibility to incorporate unconventional forms of local spatial knowledge and storytelling. However, one criticism of these methods, and of participatory GIS more generally, is that they tend to rely on conventional GIS software and have done little to advance the technology in ways that address fundamental limitations in data structure and system design.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading