Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term postmodernism appeared in academic geography in the late 1980s, although it had been circulating earlier in several disciplines and professions. The term is often used in two different ways. First, it designates an object of study whereby researchers examine some feature that is seen to be postmodern in style, character, or design. Commonly identified postmodern objects include buildings, cities, cultures, societies, and economies, although this last object is often described using the related term post-Fordist. The clustering of such postmodern objects together may be seen to imply that people are, in at least some places in the world, living in a distinctive epoch or condition of postmodernity. The other way that the term postmodernism is often used is to imply an approach (or as it has also been described, attitude, method, or sensibility) to viewing and understanding the world and how it operates.

This entry briefly outlines how these two views of postmodernism arose and considers how they interconnect in the work of two geographers, David Harvey and Michael Dear. The entry also examines the impact of postmodernism, identifying three contrasting interpretations.

Postmodernism as Object

One of the fields where postmodernism emerged initially was in architecture, where the term was used as an identifier of a new style that was different from and, indeed, critical of modernist design, which had risen to prominence in the 20th century but whose focus on the adoption of functionality, efficiency, and separation from the past had by the 1960s become subject to widespread criticism. It was at this time that architects such as Peter Eisenman, Frank Gehry, Peter Johnston, and Robert Venturi began to create new architectural designs that were promoted as being more in tune with and, indeed, learning from the performance of everyday human life. The rectilinearity and standardization characteristic of modernist architecture were replaced by an emphasis on diverse surfaces, textures, and forms, which often combined elements from both contemporary popular culture and a range of prior architectural styles.

The ideas circulating within architecture began to infuse academic studies of urban design and social life, notably through the work of Christopher Jenks and Frederick Jameson, and in the late 1980s, geographers began to make reference to the term postmodernism. In many of these studies, the term was not only applied to the design of particular buildings but also used to characterize whole cities. Edward Soja, for instance, presented Los Angeles as the quintessential postmodern city because it was composed of a plethora of urban forms reflective of a series of different divisions and fractures that came together to produce a collage of fragmentary images and experiences. David Harvey made a similar argument, albeit generalizing it to a range of North American cities that he suggested exhibited postmodernity through numerous cultural signs and images that constituted a sort of messy social collage, or pastiche, of meanings within which there was no apparent order. Postmodern architects, artists, filmmakers, and other cultural image makers were, in effect, codifying and representing a condition of social life that was already being experienced by many urban inhabitants.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading