Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Postcolonialism is a vast and diverse area of study that seeks to examine the experiences of peoples and places—colonized and colonizers alike—both during and following the period of formal colonialism. By using postcolonial theory, postcolonial studies attempt to lend voice to the colonized and offer alternative interpretations of the process of colonization and the experiences of colonialism and empire. They also seek to challenge the naturalized assumptions of Western power and knowledge while creating space for alternative (and equally valid) knowledges and power dynamics.

While postcolonial studies originated in the fields of literary and cultural studies, they have since become interdisciplinary engagements that bridge the humanities and social sciences, including human geography. This entry offers an overview of the various meanings of postcolonialism, postcolonial theory, postcolonial studies, and postcoloniality, followed by an exploration of the historical development and critiques of postcolonialism. These include the critique of postcolonial representational analyses’ immateriality, the debatable strength of real-world applicability of postcolonial critiques, and the question of the real beneficiaries of postcolonial destabilizations. It concludes with an examination of the subfields within geography that have employed a postcolonial framework.

Postcolonialism's breadth has aided in the development of multiple, sometimes hotly debated forms of the term postcolonialism itself. In a very basic and literal sense, postcolonialism refers to the period of time following colonialism, or the postindependence time period. However, this simplified notion ignores the continued connectivities, dependencies, exploitations, and forms of neo-imperialism that persist between the formerly colonized states and their former colonizers. The “post” in “postcolonialism” suggests that the era is finished, but as many scholars have pointed out, postcolonialism (like other “posts”) might be better viewed as a process of alteration with lingering colonial links. Postcolonial theorists actively work toward achieving more accurate and sensitive historiographies and representations, an equitable distribution of resources, and a rethinking and restructuring of Western knowledge production. However, to assume that such a goal has ever actually been, or ever will be, achieved is misguided.

Scholars working on postcolonialism use postcolonial theory to refer to the wide range of ideas that form the core of postcolonial studies. The works of foundational thinkers such as Edward Said, Homi Bhabha, and Gayatri Spivak, among others, have been particularly central to the field. Postcolonial studies have used these theories in a variety of ways, from work on political economy to identity and sport studies. Postcoloniality refers to the condition of living in a period of time after colonialism. This incorporates everything from material conditions, including the frequently unequal distribution of resources, to the less material realms, such as the ways in which newly independent peoples perceive their own identities. In addition to the creation of new words, postcolonial scholars have also debated whether or not the word postcolonialism should be hyphenated and even whether the single word postcolonialism does justice to the multiple, varying postcolonialisms in existence throughout the world.

Historical Development

Edward Said's Orientalism (1978) is frequently cited as the most influential work in the rise of postcolonial theory. Said employed a Foucauldian framework to critique Orientalist discourse, exposing the ways in which “the West” represented “the Orient” as barbaric, irrational, and “Other.” Part of Said's influence on postcolonial theory has been to encourage a continued focus on the critique of discursive representations. Investigations of textual representations within colonial and postcolonial discourses examine not only how places, peoples, and things are represented but also who is allowed to do the representing and the ways in which this is done. Representational analyses have examined colonial power within governmental bodies and within official discourses, but they have also included less formalized, cultural institutions and popular discourses. Because it can be argued that all representations require a degree of essentialism and are therefore inherently flawed, the question of the possibility of equitable representations arises. Spivak's (1988) answer to this issue was strategic essentialism, or the acknowledgment of the need for some simplified reduction in the representations of peoples and places for a particular political agenda.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading