Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Peasants and Peasantry

Peasants are small agricultural producers, especially in less industrialized countries, who possess their own land and who use relatively simple equipment and family labor to produce mostly for their own consumption. All peasants are involved in markets, some much more than others. They live in small rural communities, although they often interact with towns, where they sell their products and buy what they need to farm and live.

Known collectively as the peasantry, peasants have existed for millennia as the majority of humankind until very recently. Peasants have lived in a large variety of historical and geographical contexts. Originally possessing land on which they supported themselves, peasants have frequently lost their land, water, and forests and have been forced to work as wage laborers. This process has been intensified with the evolution of neoliberal capitalism. Their status within capitalist economies varies, and they can be differentiated into rich, middle, and poor peasants, respectively, depending in part on whether they retain property, hire labor, or work as wage laborers themselves.

The study of peasants has been institutionalized through the establishment of interdisciplinary journals such as Journal of Peasant Studies in the early 1970s. The 1970s marked a resurrection of peasant studies following a quarter of a century in which the field had been relegated to relative obscurity. Peasant impoverishment and insurrection in the Third World became important academic topics. Peasant studies occupy an interdisciplinary intellectual space. In scholarly discourses in general, and within human geography in particular, peasants have appeared in discussions of uneven economic development, including the transition to capitalism in Europe and in the Third World; of environmental change and political ecology; and of social protest, identity/agency, and the state. In terms of social theory, peasants have often been at the center of debates between Marxism and postmodernism/poststructuralism. Many of these themes are mentioned in this entry, which focuses on three areas: (1) whether peasants constitute a separate society/culture/economy; (2) the impacts of capitalism on peasants; and (3) peasant identity/agency and political action.

Peasants as a Specific Type of Society, Culture, or Economy

For many scholars, including supporters of modernization theory and populism, peasants constitute a separate type of society, culture, or economy. Important concepts in the modernization tradition are Robert Redfield's folk culture and George Foster's idea of limited good. According to Redfield, peasant communities are a kind of folk society that exists on a folk-urban continuum, where cities represent its modern urban end and peasant communities are placed near the other end. In the “limited good” model, in peasant societies, sources of income such as land and market opportunities are scarce, leading to stiff competition for such resources. On this basis, there arises a specific peasant moral and ethical imagination. Envy, fatalism, individualism, and fear of witchcraft are often parts of a specifically peasant worldview, which impedes development-as-modernization.

Some scholars (e.g., Daniel Thorner and Teodor Shanin) have used the term peasant to define an economy constituted by self-sufficient peasants. When Marxists refer to peasant society, as in pre-industrial Europe, they refer to class relations between peasants and feudal landowners. In a peasant society, the basic aspects of rural economic organization, such as landholding size, food output, and work motivation, are governed by the size of the peasant family, the ratio of working to nonworking family members, and the necessity to meet the family's subsistence needs. Chayanov's view of a homogeneous peasantry composed of self-sufficient petty-commodity producers who are able to subsist through family labor and forced underconsumption—which constitutes a pan-historical socioeconomic category—is contradicted by the Marxist process-oriented view stressing peasantry's internal class differentiation. Critics say that peasants cannot constitute a separate economy because they have existed in a variety of historically existing modes of production including feudalism and capitalism.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading