Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

A set of philosophies and discourses emphasizing the importance of free markets to development and prosperity, neoliberalism emerged as the guiding rationale for a wide range of responses to declining levels of economic growth in the 1980s and 1990s. A term used largely by its critics, neoliberal philosophies combine elements of classical liberalism with those of social conservatism. This entry reviews the central concepts of neoliberal-ism and its evolution in the global North and South; examines the neoliberal perspective on relationships between the state, markets, and civil society more generally; and describes criticisms that have been directed at neoliberalism, particularly with respect to its impact on the poor.

The Development of Neoliberalism

Greatly influenced by the writings of the neoclassical economist Friedrich Hayek and, later, Milton Friedman, proponents of neoliberal-ism view the minimally regulated market as the institution best able to maximize economic growth and the creation of wealth. For many neo-liberals, economies where the forces of demand and supply determine how and where goods and services are produced and exchanged are not only more efficient in generating and allocating resources than the state but also morally superior, because they give individuals freedom to choose the goods and services they want to consume. Although the central importance of free markets to the efficient and equitable allocation of resources is a shared feature of all neoliberal discourses, geographers agree that there is no pure definition of neoliberalism. This is because there are not only significant differences in the range of practices that scholars associate with neoliberal-ism but also different degrees of market engagement that countries have employed in different geographical contexts.

Friedrich Hayek

Hayek saw free markets as vital to individual liberty because free markets ensured that individuals could not manipulate the resources of a given environment for their own advantage. By communicating information in environments of uncertainty, markets, Hayek argued, facilitate a harmonious order where no individual is able to amass all the complex information required to manipulate the world to his or her own advantage. Writing in 1944 on the relationship between collective forms of social and economic organization and tyranny, Hayek viewed economies that relied on markets to allocate resources as more democratic than those where the distribution of resources was determined by states. In his famous book The Road to Serfdom, Hayek argued that centrally planned economies, such as the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, were more likely to resort to coercive restrictions on individual freedom than capitalist economies because they relied on states rather than markets to determine how resources were allocated. He believed that the impossibility of amassing all the information needed to efficiently and fairly distribute resources inevitably led states to use coercive means to achieve economic control. For Hayek, state intervention in the allocation of resources in an economy was deeply problematic. Hayek argued, “Economic control is not merely control of a sector of human life which can be separated from the rest … it is the control of the means for all our ends” (1944, pp. 91–92).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading