Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Landscape quality assessment means aesthetic evaluation of an area of Earth's surface. The word landscape originates from the 16th-century Dutch word landschap, which described paintings of inland natural or rural scenery. Originally translated into English as landskip, the term was gradually replaced by landscape. Landscape refers to the surface of land and water bodies that may be viewed and includes physical landforms, land cover, and land uses. The adjective quality denotes an aesthetic dimension that derives from the human perception of the landscape. The terms landscape quality and scenic quality are equivalent, scenery deriving from stage backdrops but now applied also to the physical environment. Scenic quality is the more common terminology in the United States. Assessment means some form of evaluation or discrimination of landscape quality. The terms values, preferences, amenity, and resources are sometimes substituted for quality.

Significance

Combining both their physical origins and the cultural overlay of human presence, and often created over millennia, landscapes reflect the living synthesis of people and place vital to local and national identity. The characteristics and quality of landscapes help define the self-image of a region—its sense of place—differentiating it from other regions. It is the dynamic backdrop to people's lives. Viewing natural landscapes may provide tangible health benefits. Many landscapes attract visitors, thereby supporting tourism and recreational industries and supporting regional economies. Landscape degradation diminishes quality of life. The iconic value of distinctive landscapes is commonly used in advertising. Many World Heritage Areas (as defined under the Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, adopted by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] in 1972) and national parks are established to safeguard landscapes of outstanding quality. The results of landscape quality assessment may influence relevant policies.

Theoretical Basis

An evolutionary perspective underlies current theories of landscape quality: Preferences for high-quality landscapes are survival enhancing. Far from being casual or trivial, Stephen Kaplan believes, aesthetics are a guide to human behavior and have far-reaching consequences.

Jay Appleton's prospect-refuge theory postulates that, originally, landscapes were preferred that enabled one to see without being seen, that provided places (prospects) where one could spy out game or the enemy while also providing places (refuges) in which to hide. Empirical studies provide some support to this theory while identifying other contributing factors; for example, mountains and trees (prospects) are preferred, but caves (refuges) are not.

Roger Urlich's affective theory postulates that natural settings and landscapes produce emotional states of well-being in their viewers. When landscape aesthetics are measured on a like-dislike dichotomy, these states correlate closely with scales such as beautiful-ugly or scenic quality scales. A study of hospital patients found that those with a view of trees recovered more quickly and required fewer analgesics than those without this view.

Gordon Orians's habitat theory postulates a biological imperative for humans to prefer environments likely to afford the necessities of life. He has found strong preference for the African savanna, containing scattered acacia trees amid extensive grassland, believed to be the environment in which humans evolved. The popularity of pastoral landscapes of trees and grass, as found in parks, reinforces his case.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading