Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

More than 60 yrs. (years) after the human right to adequate food was formally declared by the United Nations (UN), hunger remains a characteristic feature of many people in the capitalist world system. Hundreds of millions of people, from Chicago to Mumbai and from Russia to Malawi, are unable to reliably access and consume an adequate diet. This condition exists, strikingly, in a world where food production and trade have easily outpaced population growth for decades. For example, in 2006, agricultural output (not all of it food) was nearly 40% higher than in 1990, a period during which the world's population increased by around 25%. The number of hungry people in the world grew during that same period, and while hunger declined in relative terms in all the world's major regions, the recent price rise in food and the worldwide economic crisis threaten to reverse that encouraging trend. This entry discusses the definition and measurement of hunger, the world geography of undernutrition and malnutrition, the concept of food insecurity, the impact of globalization and urbanization on world hunger, and the shift of responsibility for hunger from government to private individuals and organizations.

Defining and Measuring Hunger

In a very basic sense, hunger is the experience of not being able to consume enough and the right kinds of food. While this seems straightforward enough, the identification, explanation, and alleviation of hunger are fraught with disagreements over conceptual issues related to the socially and culturally complex and dynamic relationship between human beings and food. An effort to produce a body of scientific knowledge related to that experience emerged with the modern state and its imperative to measure, quantify, and, thereby, manage and regulate the population. For well over a century, intellectual debates over the concept and phenomenon of hunger have concerned questions of objectivity, universality, reliability, validity, and statistical precision. To take one example, in the late decades of the 1800s, British nutritionists, social reformers, government officials, and colonial administrators considered local food practices—whether they reflected “rational” behavior or not—and optimal diets as they argued over the discovery of universal standards by which to determine who in Britain and its colonies was “hungry” and who had died as a result of “starvation.” In the United States, social, political, and policy debates since the 1960s have increasingly revolved around questions about the validity and reliability of hunger data, leading to a broad, state-sponsored effort to develop methods for the scientific measurement of hunger. These examples also serve to illustrate the point that scientific knowledge about hunger, no matter how technically precise, is infused with, and shaped by, politics (power relations), culture (social meanings), and the environment (human relationships with biophysical systems). In short, the task of defining and measuring hunger confronts powerful social, political, economic, and environmental geographies in the relationship of people to food and, therefore, in what constitutes hunger. In the early 2000s, conceptual debates about hunger have settled on three prominent, not uncontested, understandings of hunger.

The World Geography of Undernutrition and Malnutrition

The two most commonly recognized forms of hunger are undernutrition and malnutrition. Very basically, undernutrition occurs when a person is unable to consume enough calories to remain healthy and active on a continuing basis, depending on her or his age, sex, height, age, and daily physical exertion. Malnutrition specifies a person's inability to consume a nutritionally balanced diet. This can involve either deficient or excessive consumption of particular nutrients, such as proteins or carbohydrates. Both of these kinds of hunger result in a range of physical and mental effects on the body, most notably stunting (low height for age), wasting (low weight for height), underweight (low weight for age), impaired cognitive development, greater susceptibility to disease and injury, and, in the case of malnutrition, obesity.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading