Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The idea of governance has traditionally been understood as the pursuit of the activities of government or the actions taken by political leaders and government bureaucrats for the benefit of people. During the late 20th century, the term governance began to be used more broadly by geographers, political scientists, and other social scientists to refer to activities that not only included government actors and institutions but also notably extended beyond government. The wider actors and institutions involved include civil society, such as nongovernmental organizations, as well as, increasingly, corporate interests. Individual citizens have also been encouraged to actively participate in community-based planning processes. The notion of “good governance” in social science parlance signifies the inclusion of the multiple stakeholders who share a common concern, albeit often from conflicting perspectives, toward finding a workable and equitable way forward to manage that shared concern. This idea has become an important metanarrative for policy analysis in geography and political science. Conceptually, the idea of good governance can be applied at various scales and to a range of different concerns. This entry explores the ideas of environmental governance, local governance, global governance, and multilevel governance.

Environmental Governance

The term environmental governance signifies the pursuit of governance with reference to issues that broadly pertain to sustainability issues. The concept of environmental governance can occur at the global scale, as with concern about climate change; at the regional scale, as in transboundary watershed management; and at the local scale, as in decision making on recycling initiatives, landfills, or other local environmental issues. The appropriate scale for addressing environmental governance concerns is often influenced by the biophysical limits of the resource in question, with the stakeholders who are then involved defined by their interest in the resource in question. For example, while good governance of water is a concern shared by many people, the practical challenges of managing water vary greatly in different locations based on factors such as water availability, population, climate, and biogeography. Water's biophysical boundary is the watershed, which often complicates establishing effective governance institutions because the biophysical boundary often does not correspond to political boundaries. Hence, good governance at the watershed scale could include planners from multiple government jurisdictions and the range of often conflicting nongovernmental interests with competing demands for limited water.

For shared environmental resources, an underlying concern is to devise workable and equitable solutions that encompass both intergenerational and intragenerational equity. Intergenerational equity is particularly challenging because, while future generations have a stake in the protection of resources for the future, they (as well as the resources, wildlife or a habitat) cannot participate on their own behalf and depend on the advocacy of stakeholders such as environmental nongovernmental organizations. Part of the rationale for widening participation through environmental governance is that politicians and bureaucrats lack the mandate to take into account the needs of future generations or of nature itself (often popularly explained as “people vote and bunnies don't”) and that, through governance with involvement that extends beyond government, these considerations can be better integrated into decision making.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading