Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Globalization is a historical process of transnationalization, denationalization, and deterritorialization that encompasses different arenas, such as the economy, society, politics, culture, academia, and so on, with varying intensities and geographical differences. Loosely defined, it involves an increase in the scope, volume, and velocity of transactions across national borders, not all of which occur on a worldwide basis.

It is misleading to speak of globalization as a linear development, a fixed situation, or an undifferentiated worldwide phenomenon. Certain processes are, depending on world regions, globalized (such as trade, production, and labor and financial markets in the industrialized world), while others are constrained by local, regional, and national identities and policies (such as identity and border politics in sub-Saharan Africa; Central, East, and southeast Asia; and large parts of the greater Middle East). However, this status changes over time because the process of globalization is historically contingent. To take account of geographical differences, geographers have found the idea of globalizations (in the plural) increasingly relevant in recent years. Therefore, careful observation is necessary both to identify globalized arenas and to recognize the existence and assess the continuing relevance of national(ized) politics and (re)asserting statehood. Thus, the idea of a “borderless world” signifies some of the tendencies of contemporary hyper-globalization; depending on an individual's standpoint, such globalization may be seen as either a positive or a negative development. Those arenas that can be made out as globalized, however, are characterized by three single, though interconnected, processes: transnationalization and, in its consequences, denationalization and deterritorialization. These processes are not linear but are contested and resisted by governments, regional organizations, and nonstate antiglobalization movements. Such resistance is directed at all kinds of globalizations, but it typically emphasizes economic issues such as labor rights, economic injustices, environmental degradation, and human rights violations. This entry examines these processes and their implications for local places.

The most far-reaching impacts of those transformations relate to (a) shifts in the structure of time and space; (b) conceptualizations of human agency, including power; and (c) political and geographical imaginaries of statehood. Although those impacts appear to be historically novel, they are comparable with earlier historical periods of social and political upheaval, including their geographical distinctiveness and impacts and their complexities.

Globalization and the Compression of Space and Time

Geographical distances can be overcome more easily and rapidly than ever before in history. The resulting compression of time and space has influenced the nature of the processes associated with globalization. This compression is largely due to new technologies of transportation and communications (e.g., developments in aircraft, telegraphic and telephone communication, and computer-based information technologies), the roots of which go back to at least the mid 19th century. These innovations allow for global coordination of social and political actions in simultaneous time; for example, through synchronized communication, people from (nearly) every corner of the world can get news of events at (nearly) the same time when they occur. Empirically, however, participation in those forms of communication and information flows is a question of their accessibility—that is, of social status and power; globalizations are much more widespread in the industrialized world than in less developed regions. However, the potential use of these innovations is, in principle, unrestricted. The compression of time and space also increases the permeability of borders in a wider sense—of territorial borders that control flows of people, goods, and information across nations and states. The porosity of borders also shapes transnational social organizations and movements. Because in democratic and pluralist political cultures the use of communications technologies is generally not restricted to certain classes or the elites, social participation in and use of their advancements in the industrialized world resulted in a massive increase of substate, global organizations during the late 20th century, for example, nongovernmental organizations. The growth in the number of such nonstate actors led to an increase in transborder social, political, and economic activities worldwide. These actors and their transborder activities, enabled by modern technology, play a key role in contemporary transnationalization and denationalization. The critical relevance of these two processes of globalization is that they call into question two major modern concepts of social, political, and economic order: the nationstate and international politics.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading