Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Fieldwork in physical geography is a standard method in the discipline whereby new understandings of physical phenomena can be obtained most clearly. When combined with other comprehensive mapping tools in the geographic information science (GIScience) laboratory, such as digital elevation models and land cover or land shape data derived from satellite imagery, fieldwork becomes a highly robust means to acquire new interpretations. Surprisingly, however, in the United States at least, the training of students in the techniques of detailed fieldwork in physical geography is rather limited, although it is taught formally in more universities in Canada and in Europe. The chief reasons for this deficit may be the great diversity of geography and the considerable expense of much modern field equipment, coupled with the difficulty of finding faculty to teach the diverse and interdisciplinary methodologies of fieldwork in physical geography.

Fieldwork in physical geography has been recognized for many years as a central ingredient in the value system of many professional geographers. Some critics have argued that much fieldwork has no theoretical base and that while it may be clearly useful in research, it is not so in teaching; in fact, however, fieldwork in physical geography plays an essential role in both physical geographic research and instruction. A suggested solution to the neglect of fieldwork in much physical geography is improved dialogue between those who are conceptually or theoretically oriented and those who are empirically oriented, as well as between those oriented toward teaching and those toward research. Nevertheless, in spite of numerous publications over the past half-century for improved teaching of field methodologies, problems still occur because of the constant need to recognize new techniques and become skilled in their use. This state of affairs is thus a never-ending quest for improvement of methodologies as physical geographic science marches on.

Methods for Instruction and Research

Empirical and theoretical methods of instruction and research are two sides of the same coin in acquiring geographical knowledge. The three main elements of general geographic research (procedures, techniques, sources of data) range between the empirical and inductive, in the field, for example, and the theoretical and deductive, out of the field. Procedures of research include

  • problem formulation,
  • data collection in the field,
  • statistical and cartographic analysis of the data,
  • formulation of hypotheses, and
  • testing of hypotheses.

The techniques of research are a spectrum of research procedures that generally include

  • the real-world totality of facts,
  • observations and measurements in that real field world,
  • simulation models of that real world, and
  • mathematical optimization models.

The sources of data to accomplish the research task at hand are

  • first and foremost the field observations, whether qualitative observation perceived by sight, hearing, smell, and touch or the many quantitative measurements that should also be made, and
  • archival sources, including maps, aerial photographs, satellite imagery, government records, and the like, which are commonly carried into the field to guide the work.

A third data source can also be the theoretical work, including mathematical or numerical models, but these are rarely useful in the field at the start.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading