Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Environmental rights refer to the right to what are often referred to as “environmental services.” These include water, food, and materials for shelter. These services are intertwined with the evolving physical and cultural geographies of place. The geographic scope of such linkages has extended far beyond local influences to the planetary scale, and external pressures on both the quantity and quality of environmental services have created tensions and disparities that can be viewed by class, race, and gender at local, regional, and global scales. In this entry, the example of the right to clean water is highlighted as a case study. Environmental rights represent an area of intense debate in both academic and nonacademic circles and are a matter of life and death for the planet's most vulnerable peoples. This is in large part because such rights lie at the intersection of traditional and “modern” resource management, technology, and economic development.

Systems, Characteristics, and Environmental Justice

The environment has universally, in distinct ways, provided the basis for human existence, and formal and informal management regimes have evolved regarding access to it. Tensions emerge between groups regarding access to natural resources, and this stress is amplified when they are naturally, or made to be, “scarce.” At such times, the hierarchical structure of a given polity (or if global markets are involved, the interlinked capitalist system) may result in redistribution of resources according to the characteristics that determine power in that local system or overlapping multiple scales of systems. Such characteristics can include absolute or relative location, capital or class, connections to important political offices, gender, historical relations, linkages to other places or persons, military power, population size, or adjacency and political and economic linkages to powers outside the immediate region. Thus, environmental services become redistributed by the aforementioned systems at multiple scales to reflect these characteristics and power structures.

Injustices may occur in access to the quality or quantity of environmental services necessary for a certain group because they occupy an unfavorable position in the aforementioned hierarchies. The distribution of resources reflects the inequities in the system(s) they operate within. In addition, if the system extends beyond the local level, then it is not surprising when local people lose their environmental rights or have them stressed but are unable to work to improve their position. Thus, environmental rights are complicated by the multiscalar nature of a globalized world, the way we share it, and conflicting paradigms of development—and this can result in entrenched and systematic environmental injustice. Climate change is a high-profile example of this abstract nexus presently being played out from global to local scales.

Water

Arguably, the most well-documented recent battles regarding environmental rights have focused on the use of natural resources for development—the most well-known example being dams. The work of the World Commission on Dams illustrates this. However, in recent years, authors have increasingly discussed issues related to privatization, political and economic hierarchies, and the “human right to water” movement to address concerns about capitalism, justice, development models, and access to clean drinking water. Much of the well-publicized debate has been centered on the potential impact of free trade agreements on local governance of water, justice, and sustainability.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading