Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Environmental justice is both a social movement and a research frame. Rooted in the U.S. civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, the idea of environmental justice gained traction in the United States during the early to mid 1980s. Proponents of environmental justice seek to ameliorate circumstances where people of color (e.g., African Americans, Asians, Latinos) and low-income earners (i.e., people below the poverty line and the working poor) are disproportionately exposed to environmental harms and/or lack access to environmental benefits. Advocates of environmental justice believe that all people—irrespective of race, ethnicity, gender, or class—have the right to live in a clean, healthy, and safe environment and to enjoy equal access to safe and healthy workplaces, schools, and recreation areas and to safe and nutritious food.

This entry considers the main concepts and issues that are central to environmental justice. It begins by reviewing the historical development of the environmental justice movement and then examines what we mean by “injustice” or “inequity.” Next, the various mechanisms behind environmental injustice (i.e., structures, processes, institutions, agencies) are considered. Academic responses to the social movement are discussed, with a focus on geographers’ contributions. Finally, the entry discusses recent developments in both the social movement and academic literature.

It is important to note that environmental justice is related to but different from environmental racism. Environmental justice is also different from ecological justice or justice to nature. Those concepts refer to efforts to protect animals, plants, and vulnerable habitats and recognize the “intrinsic” value of nature. Some commentators have distanced environmental justice from ecological justice, preferring instead to use the term social justice environmentalism. In reality, these three concepts have much in common and often overlap.

The Social Movement

When the environmental justice movement began is uncertain. Some commentators suggest that the movement began in the late 1960s. What is clear is that by the early 1980s the movement had noticeably mobilized around two concerns: (1) getting law makers and decision makers to recognize that so-called minority groups and the poor were disproportionately exposed to environmental hazards and (2) developing effective remedies for these problems.

During the 1980s, groups of concerned citizens in the Southern United States, accompanied by religious leaders and politicians of color, mobilized to help vulnerable people combat toxic landfill facilities, hazardous industries, and other locally unwanted land uses within their communities. The movement has since expanded from a series of disparate grassroots initiatives to a recognizable collective with an international agenda.

Originally, environmental justice activists asserted that mainstream environmental groups such as Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and the Wilderness Society had ignored the plight of socioeconomically marginalized and vulnerable communities, focusing solely on nonhuman species. The movement's initial purpose was therefore to develop an alternative environmentalism, one based on direct action, social inclusiveness, and human concerns. More recently, many mainstream environmental groups have assisted in environmental justice struggles.

Early examples of successful campaigns include a predominantly African American community's fight against the siting of a PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls) landfill in Warren County, North Carolina; a battle by Latino mothers of East Los Angeles to prevent the construction of a waste incinerator in their community; and campaigns by Latino farmworkers against poisoning from toxic agricultural chemicals. The early 1980s to the early 1990s was a decade of progress for the movement. Activists garnered increasing publicity and leveraged local, state, and federal action against practices of intentional targeting of socioeconomically marginalized and vulnerable communities for toxic and unwanted land uses. They achieved this through multiple actions including lobbying, political incorporation, forced buyouts and relocations, and lawsuits. By the early 1990s, the movement spanned the United States and encompassed issues as diverse as industrial “cancer alleys,” uranium enrichment facilities, biotechnology labs, brownfield redevelopment, “transit racism,” lead paint in old houses, and radioactive waste sites. With the rapid expansion of the movement came formal organizations, such as the Citizens Clearinghouse for Hazardous Waste, that served to distribute information, enhance communication between groups, and promote collective action.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading