Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The word tundra originates from the Finnish tunturi, which means “completely treeless heights.” This is how the word is applied broadly all over the world to areas of higher altitude than the tree line. However, the geographically largest and most significant tundra areas are those north of the latitudinal tree line in Eurasia and North America. These tundra areas are mainly situated in lowlands.

The tundra as a biome is relatively young, having developed in the early Pleistocene. However, the characteristic floras of tundras developed earlier, probably during the Miocene-Pliocene, in the highlands of Central Asia and in the Rocky Mountains of North America. In the same period (late Tertiary), present tundra areas were covered by various types of mixed and coniferous forests, now associated with the boreal forest region. Circumpolar regions of tundra-steppe environments developed during the Pleistocene. Rapid expansion of these areas during this period may have been associated with the success of such now-extinct macrograzers as mammoths.

A relative mild climate with spruce forests north of their present limit occurred in the last interglacial (Eem). During the last glaciation (Wisconsin), major parts of the Northern Eurasian and American continents were covered by the Eurasian and Laurentide ice sheets, respectively. There were, however, nonglaciated pockets extending far north, as in parts of Beringia and Northern Yukon Territory. In such nonglaciated areas, the diversity of animal and plant species and the general development of the soil and plant communities have been shown to be no more complex than comparable glaciated land masses nearby. This has lent support for the theory that at present arctic tundra ecosystems, including soils, are in equilibrium with the prevailing climate. Thus, they have been considered quite stable, although many areas have been deglaciated for only 3,000 to 8,000 years. Whether this apparent stability now is threatened with a warming climate is the subject of considerable current research. The following two sections review briefly the basic biogeographical and soil formation characteristics of the tundra region.

Biogeographical Subcategories

From a biogeographical viewpoint, the Arctic is often defined as the lands beyond the climatic limit of tree growth in upland habitats between river drainages. These areas have often, in particular in North America, been considered to consist of only two floristic units, tundra and polar deserts. Furthermore, in the Western Hemisphere, the application of basic, diagnostic characteristics for the division of the Arctic into simple subdivisions based on the degree of closedness of the vegetation has been widespread. Traditionally, scientists of the Soviet Union have identified a larger number of biogeographical subzones than North Americans.

Andreev and Aleksandrova, for example, identified 13 arctic vegetation types and five subzones within the tundra zone based on the species composition and characteristics related to life form and migration history. In addition, they identified a number of longitudinal provinces across the Eurasian continent. Part of the reason for the varying use of subzones by North American and Eurasian scientists is probably real differences in the physical geography of the two continents. In Eurasia, most of the land north of the tree line is continental, with groups of islands in the Arctic Ocean. The climate shows a gradual northward shift over contiguous land masses, which provides the basis for major subzones or “belts” of specific vegetation types. In contrast, the American continent has a different geomorphology: No unbroken land mass extends to 78° N as in Eurasia and translongitudinal mountain ranges, sea barriers, and ice caps combined with their respective climatic influences cause a coarse-grained mosaic vegetation pattern rather than arrangements in belts or zones. Bliss and Matveyeva provide a useful overview of tundra subcategorization still used widely and also in connection with modern impact studies of climate change. Table 1 shows the areal extent of the subcategories described in the following sections.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading