Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

An important trend in the global economy since the early 1990s has been the proliferation of regional initiatives among countries. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the European Union (EU) best illustrate such a trend; however, regionalism among developing countries has also become popular. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) represents the most advanced regional bloc in Asia (Figure 1). Conceived and formed in 1967, it has grown from 5 to 10 members (Table 1) and developed from an informal to a more formal entity, creating the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) and ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) along the way. However, ASEAN has often been compared with the EU or NAFTA with the general observation that it has produced a system of practices that are undergoverned and underinstitutionalized. To understand the nature of ASEAN regionalism, this entry will highlight three themes, namely, (1) the historical context of regional processes in southeast Asia, (2) the ASEAN model of regionalism, and (3) the AFTA.

Figure 1 ASEAN members. ASEAN comprises virtually all countries in southeast Asia.

None
Source: Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Retrieved June 8, 2008, from http://www.aseansec.org.

Historical Context

Unlike NAFTA, the impetus for ASEAN was not rooted in a desire among countries in southeast Asia for increased intraregional trade and investment. Rather, postcolonial southeast Asia in the 1960s was preoccupied with nation building and issues of sovereignty and identity. Galvanized by the outbreak of war in Vietnam, the five original members, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand, embarked on a model of “relational control” that was effectively driven by concerns of regional security and stability. Such control included the containment of communist expansion from Indochina and the construction of an indigenous geopolitical space in the context of ideological competition between the Soviet Union and the United States.

Table 1 Development of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
YearMember
1967Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand
1984Brunei
1995Vietnam
1997Myanmar, Laos
1999Cambodia
Source: Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Retrieved June 8, 2008, from http://www.aseansec.org.

A few attempts to develop regional consciousness and identity had preceded the formation of ASEAN but failed to gain widespread support among the countries. Japan, for example, had pursued a vision of regional co-prosperity in the 1920s by proposing an East and southeast Asian economic bloc. However, its activities in World War II precluded any role for Japanese leadership in the proposed regional initiative. Britain, too, had tried to promote the then Filipino leader Manuel Quezon's pan-Malayan union comprising the Philippines, British Malaysia, and the Dutch East Indies in the 1940s, but with little success.

By the 1960s, however, events were favorable for the formation of ASEAN. First, with the victory of Viet Minh forces in Vietnam in 1954, the United States began to pay greater attention to the region. The seeds of regional cooperation were sown, for instance, when the Unites States agreed to contribute funds and help establish the Asian Development Bank. Second, the ascension of new leadership under Indonesian President Suharto greatly reduced tensions between two of the original ASEAN members, namely, Malaysia and Indonesia, paving the way for improved regional relations. Third, conflicts in Indochina provided an incentive for increased engagement in regional problems.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading