Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Anarchism is a political philosophy named from the Greek word anarchos, which means “without a ruler.” The key tenets of anarchist thought are antiauthoritarianism and the formation of a new social order based on mutual collaboration and decision making. Advocates of anarchism see the elimination of the state and other forms of authority as part of a necessary progression toward the formation of a voluntary and self-sustaining society. Anarchists may emphasize individualism, as an extension of liberalism, or socialism, which rejects private property and espouses cooperative ownership. Anarchists often argue for ecological preservation, advocating that societies should live in harmony or equilibrium with the natural world. Two well-known anarchists writing during the late 19th century, Peter Kropotkin and Élisée Reclus, were also influential geographers. During the 1960s and 1970s, geographers engaged with anarchist thought as part of reinvigorating approaches to theory, research, and teaching. As radical geographies emerged, scholarly focus on anarchism dwindled; instead, Marxism, feminism, queer theory, and postcolonialism received further attention. While there has been little theoretical development of anarchist ideas in geography, recent work by a small number of scholars explores anarchist ideas as expressed and practiced in alter-globalization and environmental direct-action movements.

The intersection of anarchism and geography remains underexplored. The main contributions of anarchism include the principle of mutual aid as explained by Peter Kropotkin, environmental preservation, theories and practices that attempt new forms of social order, and uses of space that disrupt and decentralize authority.

Early Anarchist Geographers

Élisée Reclus (1830–1905) was a French geographer who participated in the Paris Commune of 1871, when Parisian workers seized control of the city government. He was imprisoned and then exiled to Switzerland, where he wrote several volumes of geographic works that were thoroughly interlaced with anarchist thought. Reclus proposed an equitable distribution of the world's resources, arguing that decisions about production and distribution should be made by local communities. This was a direct response to imperialist claims on the resources of the global South; he argued that existing social inequalities were the result of authoritarian social and political organization rather than productive capabilities or overpopulation. Reclus was also an early advocator for environmental preservation.

Peter Kropotkin (1842–1921) was a Russian prince, high-ranking military officer, and physical geographer, who credited fieldwork in Siberia with readying him to become an anarchist. His theory of mutual aid analyzed cooperation among animals, using examples in the natural world as a scientific basis for collaborative human organization. This was a response to the Social Darwinists of the time, who were proponents of competition. Kropotkin's essay “What Geography Ought to Be” proposed educational reform and emphasized shared humanity across international borders, an important argument that weakens the legitimacy of the state.

Their background in geographic scholarship influenced both men, engendering a distinctive understanding of humanity in different cultural and economic contexts and a broader comprehension of possible social and economic structures.

Anarchism and Radical Geography: The 1960s and 1970s

During the late 1960s and 1970s, a number of geographers drew from anarchist thought in attempts to reinvigorate and rethink aspects of the discipline, especially to inject practical and socially useful practices into research and teaching methodologies. In a special issue of the journal Antipode, meant to stimulate new interest in anarchist ideas, Richard Peet criticized geographical scholarship and challenged his colleagues to use anarchist principles as transformative tools. He wrote that geography, as a descriptive discipline, had become an instrument for the scientific justification of existing inequalities rather than an active challenger of the status quo.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading