Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Media Literacy

At the 1992 National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy, a rough consensus emerged from U.S. scholars—from such diverse fields as media studies, media production, literature and language arts, library information science, and educational theory and practice—regarding the importance of media literacy, its definition, and significant concepts for teaching it. Media literacy was defined as “the ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and communicate messages in a variety of forms.” A media-literate person “can decode, evaluate, analyze, and produce both print and electronic media.” Scholars could not agree on a list of goals or instructional practices for teaching media literacy; however, by using models developed by educators in Australia, Canada, and Great Britain, they did agree on the following conceptualizations:

Media are constructed and construct reality; media have commercial implications; media have ideological and political implications; form and content are related, each of which has a unique aesthetic, codes, and conventions; and receivers negotiate meaning in media.

Thus a comprehensive definition of media literacy involves the ability to locate multimedia resources (research skills); to analyze them critically (possibly using various models of analysis); to evaluate them in the social, economic, political and historical contexts in which they are created and interpreted; and to interpret them in light of the grammatical logics (textual and visual) that shape them. For some scholars, media literacy also involves the ability to create media messages in print, audio, video, and multimedia formats, such as are found on the Web. For others, it involves not only acquiring cognitive skills but also aesthetic, emotional, and moral development.

Although media literacy is primarily taught in K–12 curriculums, it is also taught in institutions of higher education around the globe. In North America, the term often used is media literacy, whereas in the United Kingdom and other English-speaking countries it is often called media education. Teachers of media literacy use diverse pedagogical techniques, including close textual analysis, contextual analysis of specific media texts such as films or television shows, genre analysis, cross-media comparisons, and macro-analysis of media industries, such as advertising. They often employ techniques as diverse as role playing and media production.

The interdisciplinary field of media literacy studies has been informed by various conceptual models, such as media effects/inoculation theory, uses and gratifications, cultivation theory, cultural/critical studies, and semiotics. The conceptual foundations drawn upon result in very different kinds of media literacy education programs. American media studies tend to reflect the effects/inoculation and uses and gratifications paradigms, whereas Latin American and European countries draw primarily from cultural/critical studies and semiotics.

Types of Media Literacy

Media ecology theorist Joshua Meyrowitz argues for the importance of developing multiple media literacies in students. Specifically, he enumerates three media literacies; content literacy, media grammar literacy, and (drawing on the American media ecology tradition) medium literacy. He explains that each type is linked to a different conception of what counts as media.

The notion that media are conduits that carry messages points to the need for media content literacy. This is the most common understanding of media literacy, often espoused by those outside the discipline of communication. Content literacy involves being able to access and analyze a variety of types of media messages for both manifest (obvious or denotative) and latent (implicit or connotative) meanings. It also involves understanding how the conventions of various genres—for example, documentaries, broadcast news, or western films—shape construction and interpretation. It also involves awareness of how various commercial, cultural, or institutional forces shape both, which messages are constructed (agenda-setting), and how they are constructed (framing). Finally, it involves examining how different audiences—for example, women or working-class white males—might “read” messages differently. Meyrowitz argues that an explicit or implicit focus on media content dominates most media literacy debates and is the view held by such diverse advocates as ministers condemning the immoral content of television; activists protesting the limited or distorted portrayals of gays, women, and minorities; and qualitative and quantitative media researchers studying manifest and latent content in news and entertainment programming.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading