Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Affirmative action—loosely defined as a set of policies, remedies, or requirements designed to overcome the effects of past discrimination against people of color and women—had its roots in the administration of President John F. Kennedy. It came to full flower after the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed by Kennedy's successor, President Lyndon B. Johnson, to ban discrimination based on race, ethnicity, or gender in workplaces, schools, and other venues. Its proponents argued that proactive steps to recruit and favorably consider members of underrepresented groups for hiring, promotions, or university admissions were necessary to counter practices, overt or subtle, that once systematically hindered advancement of these groups. Critics responded that affirmative action amounted to “reverse discrimination” that privileged some at the expense of others (especially white men).

Whether voluntarily pursued or compelled by government or the courts, affirmative action operated at its zenith from 1969 to 1980 with support from all three government branches. It began to wane, however, under skepticism from President Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party, an increasingly conservative U.S. Supreme Court, and doubting voters in California and some other states. In its heyday, affirmative action helped transform university campuses and countless workplaces—including those in the news media—from enclaves of white male dominance into more integrated environments that benefited from gender equity and multicultural diversity.

Unlike affirmative action, focused on alleviating past wrongs, the concept of diversity emphasizes the advantages of multiculturalism for all—employers, employees, corporations, consumers, students, and college campuses—without much heed to the past. In a modern era more attuned to diversity than affirmative action, then, it is easy to overlook the kinds of once common discriminatory practices that led the federal government to put the teeth of affirmative action into enforcing the Civil Rights Act.

Ingrained Discrimination in Workplaces

Gender bias was once so ingrained in the workplace that newspaper “help wanted” ads were segregated by sex, with high-paying managerial positions designated for men and low-paying clerical work earmarked for women. Many believed female workers ought to make less than male breadwinners.

Scholarship on the history of women journalists points to newsroom norms that routinely channeled hard news to male reporters—even coverage of women's suffrage after it moved to the front pages—while relegating female journalists to the women's pages and soft features. Jan Whitt writes that many editors believed women were inherently naïve or simply lacked the abilities of men. Women's sections, dating to the late 19th century, originally were aimed at wooing female readers for newspaper advertisers, given that women were more likely than men to make household purchases. Scholars note, however, that women's sections conveyed a message that the rest of the paper, with its emphasis on affairs in other spheres, was the province of males.

In the 19th century, as Dustin Harp has observed, female editors and publishers typically inherited their positions from deceased husbands or fathers. However, the changing role of women in industrialized society spawned women journalists in their own right. Some wrote columns, a culturally sanctioned pursuit for women. The 1920 Census reported 7,105 female reporters and editors, a tally that more than doubled to 15,890 in 1940. Most of these women, however, worked on women's pages, for magazines, or in book publishing, as Maurine H. Beasley and Sheila J. Gibbons report. Even into the 1960s, some journalism schools restricted enrollment of women students, subscribing to the belief that the field was limited for them.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading