Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The concept of gender performance has developed within debates concerning sex, gender, and sexuality in sociology and feminism. Though conceptualized somewhat differently by various scholars, gender performance can be broadly defined as the act of engaging in a set of behaviors that display an individual's gender identity as female or male and that cause the individual to be so perceived during social interaction. The notion of gender performance relies on a division between “sex” and “gender.” Sociologists and feminists have sought to clarify the tendency to conflate these terms by introducing the idea of a sex/gender divide wherein these two concepts are distinct, though related. Sex is defined as biological femaleness or maleness. Gender is a social construction, or set of ideas and expectations about femininity and masculinity. There are various understandings of how gender is performed, and such performance may involve the body (through body modifications such as cutting hair), dress, comportment, and social interaction and discourse.

Feminists have politicized the notion of gender as performance by arguing that women are not naturally or biologically weaker or inferior to men, but are created as less powerful through gendered social practice. Developments in feminist thought have led some feminist scholars to challenge the notion of a sex/gender distinction, a critique that has brought gender performance even more to the center of such debate. This entry describes the principal theories within which the concept of gender performance has developed. Though they appear here under distinct headings, these perspectives have not developed in isolation from each other and share many key ideas and concepts.

Symbolic Interactionism: Gender Displays

Sociologist Erving Goffman developed a symbolic interactionist approach to social interaction. Symbolic interactionism is a sociological perspective that views social reality as a product of the meaning-making of individuals during interaction with others. Goffman outlines a dramaturgical approach to social interaction wherein he likens social interaction to performances by actors onstage. He sees individuals as creative players in social interaction, influenced by the performances of other actors as well as specific audiences.

Gender is expressed during social interaction through a form of interactive performance that Goffman terms gender displays. Gender displays help define what will occur during a social interaction and how the interaction will be organized. Goffman likens gender displays between women and men to the roles of domination-subordination characterized by the parent-child relationship: the relationship between women and men is unequal, with women positioned as the dependent and subordinate child. For example, a male's masculine gender displays in interaction with a woman will likely position him as an initiator and leader; the woman then conducts herself in a gender display appropriate to femininity so that she follows the man's lead.

Though Goffman recognizes biological differences between women and men in the form of reproductive capabilities, he argues against the common interpretation of gender displays as being demonstrative of the inherent nature of female or male individuals. Goffman asserts that different behaviors of women and men are instead rooted in culture, rather than biology and that gender displays create the notion of gender difference. He uses the term sex-class to refer to women and men as distinct social classes, clearly defining the social inequality between women and men as a social (as opposed to biological) design.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading